Talk:Raja (1999 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Andhra Pradesh / Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Andhra Pradesh (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

On 23 January 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Raja (1999 Indian film) to Raja (1999 film). The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 23 January 2024[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Bensci54 (talk) 19:26, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Raja (1999 Indian film) → Raja (1999 film) – No other 1999 film. @Tassedethe: Why was it moved? [1] DareshMohan (talk) 19:10, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

At the time of the move Raja (1999 Bangladeshi film) existed. It was subsequently prodded and deleted. Tassedethe (talk) 19:45, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Seems like this should be an uncontroversial WP:RMT move then. 162 etc. (talk) 20:37, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination and 162 etc. Uncontroversial technical request indeed. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 23:54, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy move as uncontroversial. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:02, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.