Talk:Ram Avatar Sharma

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 October 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: Bihar Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Bihar (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved to Ram Avatar Sharma. --BDD (talk) 20:55, 27 October 2012 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

Mahamahopadhyaya Pandit Ram Avatar Sharma → Pandit Ram Avatar Sharma – Both Mahamahopadhyaya and Pandit are honourific, so I suggest moving to either Pandit Ram Avatar Sharma or just Ram Avatar Sharma Tito Dutta ✉ 16:30, 12 October 2012 (UTC) .[reply]

Easy support - redundant honorifics. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:37, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pandit is also an honorific (title). :-) --Tito Dutta (talk) 02:57, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There's no reason to suspend discussion, but it shouldn't be closed, and the article shouldn't be moved, until the article's AfD resolves (cf. Wikipedia:Don't move articles at AfD). --BDD (talk) 16:59, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, but support moving to Ram Avatar Sharma. Most literature sources don't add any honorific. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RJFF (talk • contribs) 15:10, 20 October 2012‎ (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.