Talk:Rattlesnake Mountain (Benton County, Washington)

Mountains Mid‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Washington / Eastern Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Eastern Washington task force (assessed as High-importance).

The public access section[edit]

The section with the heading "Public access" does not appear to be particularly neutral in tone, and it also appears to be undersourced (such as a claim about a law having been signed in 2014, with a source from 2013). Unfortunately I am unable to check some of the sources as they are restricted access outside the US, but maybe there are some uninvolved editors who are able to investigate this further. --bonadea contributions talk 10:01, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is now further undersourced, as footnote 14 now leads to a notice that the article is no longer available, as checked 17 November 2020. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.232.211.130 (talk) 18:13, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Bonadea:: You're right about (former) sources 13 and 14, and furthermore source 15 did not support the claim that referred to it (and this statement was OR on top of that). With all the unsourceable and non-neutral claims being made in this section I just cut it back dramatically and left in what the verifiable sources said. Have a look and feel free to revert. I left the neutrality note in place for now. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:00, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]