Talk:Rose Mary Crawshay Prize

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Purpose of this article[edit]

While it is inevitable that this article will hold a list of prize winners, the article's intent is to describe the prize, the history of the prize and the awarding of the prize. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 12:44, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requirement for navigation template, and category[edit]

There is a requirement for a navigation template, but there is little point in creating one at this juncture. I'm not sure about the need for a succession box (I created one at Helen Small, but I think a nav box (such as {{MMFF}}) will do the job far better when there are sufficient articles amassed under the topic.

I'm about to create a category, once I find a suitable higher category. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 12:44, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the number of items involved, I think I was wrong about a navigation template. A succession box seems to me to be a far better option now. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 17:33, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalisation[edit]

The entire title requires leading capitalisation. "Prize" is part of the formal name of the award. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 15:18, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redlinks etc[edit]

It's obvious that there is, today, a huge proportion of redlinks. What should be equally obvious is that the winners are notable because they have received a significant prize, and that the works are notable because they are the vehicles which caused the prize to be awarded. And the authors and the works are verifiable because, in part, of this prize.

Thus it seems wholly valid to leave redlinks (and to create others) to be filled by editors with an interest in the award and its winners. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 18:25, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Rose Mary Crawshay Prize. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:32, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Rose Mary Crawshay Prize. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]