This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
The contents of the Science center page were merged into Science museum on 17 May 2017 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history.
I propose integrating this article with "Science museum", and then add a re-direct from Science center to Science museum. As far as I can see, all modern science museums have some kinds of interactive element now, and it would make sense to have all the content in one article - especially the growing list of science museums/science centers. Markus Poessel 09:05, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Interestingly enough, this page started as a redirect to Science museum... However, I have no opinion on whether or not a merge is appropriate. If you think it is, I suggest you employ one or another variant of {{merge}}. JoergenB (talk) 16:14, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In more than half a decade, this stub article has failed to develop, and remains unreferenced. The definitional distinction remains unclear, and there is substantial overlap with the larger Science museum article, which is at least Start-class. I strongly support merging this stub into the larger article, and editing out the redundant coverage. Reify-tech (talk) 16:19, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Also - this proposal is 10 years old and nobody has done it yet? Wow. Bonomont (talk) 12:27, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
