Talk:Seghill

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Seghill article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

North East England Low‑importance

	North East England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject North East England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North East EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject North East EnglandTemplate:WikiProject North East EnglandNorth East England articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Should 1st Seghill Scouts have a seperate article?Djmckee1 17:51, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think its necessary, unless the section grows too much. Danielnez1 16:37, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Links[edit]

I have moved all links from the article to the Links Section; This has greatly cleaned the article. Let me know if you object.Djmckee1 - Talk 06:34, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S:I also think this article needs pictures, I shall try to take some. Djmckee1 - Talk 20:25, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Population[edit]

Does anyone have the population of Seghill? Thanks Djmckee1 - Talk 05:56, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Still A Stub?[edit]

Do you think that this is still a stub? Djmckee1 - Talk-Sign 17:51, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seghill Parish Church Holy Trinity Mares Close, Seghill Northumberland[edit]

In 1849, the Parish Church of Seghill (Holy Trinity) was Consecrated. It is still very much alive and serving the community, so why no mention? The Rev`d Phil Hughes Vicar of Seghill Village — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.133.253.94 (talk) 11:11, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Seghill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080705210612/http://www.seghill.org.uk/ to http://www.seghill.org.uk/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070319033352/http://www.seghill-rfc.co.uk/ to http://www.seghill-rfc.co.uk/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070205055748/http://notolandfill.on21.co.uk/ to http://notolandfill.on21.co.uk/
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.clubwebsite.co.uk/afcseghill/clubnews.pl/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:57, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]