Talk:Sensory integration therapy

This article was nominated for deletion on 20 January 2018. The result of the discussion was keep.

Autism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Autism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all aspects of autism and autistic culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutismWikipedia:WikiProject AutismTemplate:WikiProject AutismAutism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alternative medicine

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine articles

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 5 January 2022 and 29 April 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mm17t (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Ahackney1702, Israghanim.

References needed[edit]

The body of this article has zero references, and I expect that it contains many claims that on balance are not supported by reliable sources. I have tagged it; if we can't find good sources for it perhaps we should just remove the body and turn the article into a stub. The lead is well-cited, so it can stay. Eubulides (talk) 15:58, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the references from the introduction, and it seems the writer is writing with bias. For example, for the discussion on weighted vest, it was written as if there definitely was no benefit. There were no benefits found. So, there is no reason weighted vests should, at this point, be used clinically without better information. Immediately after that statement in the cited article, it was then stated that there could be benefits, but those were unknown - that methodology of the studies should be improved.

I am not an active editor for Wikipedia, but I was researching for my son. I hope this will be updated with better references and more objectivity. User: Anonymous 21:33, 25 May, 2011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.182.46.172 (talk) 01:34, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article has zero references past the introduction and it violates Wikipedia:NPOV anywhere you look except the introduction. The article could be remedied by sourcing all this non-sourced content with reliable sources and making the language of the article more NPOV. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123chess456 (talk • contribs) 14:31, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with POV[edit]

This article still have problems with NPOV, as the theme is sensory integration therapy, but derails into a extensive teory about A. Jean Ayres's research when a concise section would be enough. --Luk3 (talk) 16:18, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]