Talk:Space-Men

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: Italian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the Italian cinema task force.

Untitled

The packaging of this film and most reviews of it would insist that Archie Savage is one of the stars of this film. As Savage portrayed a black spacecraft pilot, commander, and ultimately a hero, a highly unusual role for the time, this distinguishes this otherwise insignificant (perhaps dreadful) film as groundbreaking. I believe the original posters and other promotional material for the film alone should be sufficient to establish Savage as a co-star.Tomligon (talk) 00:42, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016 additions

Several of the sources added to this article seem to be sourced from fan sites, or have made the infobox try to explain information which it was not intended for (the composer section was particularly confusing. :)). I've removed unsourced information and tagged others which I don't feel pass WP:RS or WP:SPS standards. If we can get some reasoning why they are acceptable, I'll let them stay, otherwise, I'll probably remove them later. Andrzejbanas (talk) 23:16, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As of July, not further sources or explanations of how they are reliable have been made. I'll be removing them now. Andrzejbanas (talk) 19:56, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]