The contents of the TM Travel page were merged into Wellglade Group on April 2021. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history.
This article was nominated for deletion on 14 February 2021. The result of the discussion was merge.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport articles
TM Travel is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This operator is a major operator of services around Sheffield and the surrounding area and is notable - other much smaller operators have a wiki entry so why not TM Travel?
Thoughts on this? 79.75.133.174 (talk) 17:21, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately in regards to notability I would say Google News results proves that this isn't a notable subject and IMHO it's unlikely it ever will be. Of course GNews isn't the be-all and end-all but there needs to be substantial articles which unfortunately for this subject there isn't any. Plus 1 AFD participated and the closing admin belived this was worthy of a merge too,
Anyway you're more than welcome to start an WP:RFC and seek outside/neutral views on the issue, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 17:38, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If we expand the scope of the article to include routes operated by the company, I think there is enough here. The previous AfD was poorly attended and should probably have been a no consensus close IMO.
I'm happy to recreate and expand the article. NemesisAT (talk) 10:29, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hey @NemesisAT, Personally I'm still not seeing enough notability here however you'd be more than welcome to recreate and expand I have no issues with that, Many thanks, –Davey2010Talk 16:35, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A updated version has been created at Draft:TM Travel. This can be expanded and if it gets to the point where somebody feels the reasons given in the AfD have been overcome, can be nominated for publishing using the Articles for Creation tool where an uninvolved editor can assess. Haxbone (talk) 06:06, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for this, though it's better to just restore the article here as that'll preserve the history. I may give it a shot later. NemesisAT (talk) 00:02, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
