Talk:The Beguiling

The Beguiling has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 8, 2013. (Reviewed version).

This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comics: Canadian Bottom‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Bottom	This article has been rated as Bottom-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Canadian comics work group.

Canada: Toronto Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto (assessed as Low-importance).

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

https://www.thestar.com/life/food_wine/2015/05/08/a-sweet-discussion-on-comics-fed.html

Move to Mirvish Village[edit]

This article is misleading re when the store moved to Mirvish Village. It was already located in the two-storey there as early as the fall of 1996 (I know, because I began shopping there regularly my first year of university there), before it was sold to its subsequent owners. I couldn't tell you what date the move was.

I'd be happy to edit it so that the timeline was clear, but without a citation, I'm not going to just make stuff up. As written, it doesn't actually say that it moved after being sold---it's ambiguous, as are the sources I can find. A reference with the move date would be most helpful. CüRlyTüRkey^Talk_Contribs 02:28, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Beguiling/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 12:02, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be glad to take this one, Curly--sorry you've had to wait so long for a review on it. Comments to follow in a minute. -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:02, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, this looks solid and essentially ready to pass. I've made some tweaks as I went; feel free to revert any with which you disagree and we can discuss. Only two points I see that need attention:

"and by Drawn and Quarterly." this probably needs citation.
- I can't find one, so I've removed this. Curly Turkey (gobble) 19:31, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"and the Joe Shuster Awards' Harry Kremer Retailer Award in 2010" --it doesn't look like this second one was also shared; this should probably be clarified.
- Clarified. Curly Turkey (gobble) 19:31, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:18, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That'll do it, then. All other criteria checked and satisfactory; thanks for another quality contribution. -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:05, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]