Talk:The Curse of the Werewolf

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.

Horror Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Score[edit]

I'm deleting this weird line in the opening paragraph that the music is "the first British serial film score." WTF is that supposed to mean? The phrase is meaningless. It's certainly not the first film score in a British film-- that goes back about 30 years before the movie. It's not a "serial"-- and there WERE no serials made in England, at least not in the filmic sense. It's not the first score anyone ever did for a Hammer film, the music was not picked up and used "serially" in any other film. The score was a score, not any different than any other film score done by Hammer or any other company. Ted Newsom (talk) 16:37, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Curse of the Werewolf 1.jpg[edit]

Image:Curse of the Werewolf 1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:29, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Cursewerewolf.jpg[edit]

Image:Cursewerewolf.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:41, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Additional citations[edit]

Why and where does this article need additional citations for verification? What references does it need and how should they be added? Hyacinth (talk) 00:48, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox[edit]

Michael Carreras was the executive producer (and Anthony Nelson Keys was associate producer); per usage at Template:Infobox film, these roles are not included in the "Producer" parameter. Also, the inclusion of only French box office data is not useful. Keri (talk) 12:01, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What was censored?[edit]

And is the description of the plot in this article of the censored or uncensored version? 24.16.239.30 (talk) 06:49, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Bad art"?[edit]

In the story "Snow Day" by Catherynne M. Valente, the protagonist is literally allergic to "bad art" and this movie is given as the prime example. Perhaps this article should mention how the movie is perceived in popular culture, especially since its rerelease.

By the time the beautiful mute jailer’s daughter died giving birth to her cursed son in a badly-lit Spanish forest under the millionth shot of a portentous moon, Gudrun lay on the butter-streaked floor of the theater gasping for air. Hot, reeking tears poured from her swollen eyes. By the time Mrs. Kamēaloha got her safely back up the mountain, the girl’s face was covered in tiny silver pimples, like spores bursting open.

24.16.239.30 (talk) 06:57, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]