Talk:The Girls Next Door

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Changes[edit]

I removed this phrase: "All three girls are Married to Robbie Aumuller." I assume this was vandalism. Andrewdoane 15:34, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removed blog speculation[edit]

I've removed this from the article (my italics): There has been some speculation of the type of relationship the girls have with Hefner, especially since one is lesbian and "not the least bit interested in men," while another is open to all types of sex. Only one appears genuinely interested in a relationship with Hefner. [1]. The link is a blog that doesn't seem to have any reputable published sources. I've moved the claim here pending verification, but WP:SOURCE seems pretty clear that such speculation doesn't belong in the article. WP:RS is probably more to the point, on second thought. -Phoenixrod 22:48, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

I don't know who added all the ratings information, and although it sounds legit, we really need some sources. Also, the fact that Bridget is married sound like it could be vandalism. I haven't seen or heard anything about that, and I've been working on this page for almost two years now. CDaly 01:46, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bridget's marriage to Chad has been known among fans for a long time, but it was never added here because there was no real proof, just a lot of circumstantial evidence: [2] In the girls' recent interview with Elle, the journalist mention that Bridget is supposed to be married, but there is nothing from Bridget in the interview confirming it, and she gets really upset if you ask her about it on her fanboard. As a fan I think all the circumstantial evidence does prove she's married, but as a Wiki editor I don't think there's really an appropriate source to cite it as fact. Queer Scout 22:46, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, unless Bridget or someone else really confirms it, I agree.

CDaly

Bridget being married was mentioned in Isabella St. James's book about the mansion. She lived in the mansion for two or three years, overlapping with Bridget's first year or so. She is clearly not a fan of Bridget's, but the fact that Bridget never denied the rumor or made any comment regarding it kinda convinces me.

She is married... http://www.starmagazine.com/news/12903 ... An easy cross-reference on her Wiki page and cited reference will confirm it. Put it in if it is germane to this article, but yes, she is married. --65.67.158.126 (talk) 01:32, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're replying to a dead discussion that's over a year old. Bridget used to deny being married, which is why it was not included back then. When she first came out and admitted it (in the Star piece) her marriage info was added. Queer Scout (talk) 14:12, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DVDs[edit]

Does anybody know if the show on DVD is censored like it is on television?--Josh 15:17, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The DVD's are not censored, for either nudity or language. Sept 9, 2007.

does anyone know when season three is coming to dvd? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.106.110.203 (talk) 03:09, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kendra leaving?[edit]

Is Kendra leaving the house, or is that just an internet rumor? She's the least liked of the trio, perhaps because of that awful laugh. --24.21.149.124 (talk) 08:06, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kendra has left the Mansion and is now engaged to a footballer, but she will continue to appear on GND. In fact she is getting married at the Mansion next June and her wedding will be on the show. 80.44.181.61 (talk) 09:11, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Twins break up?[edit]

Is it accurate to say the twins have broken up with Hefner? It seems as though they have simply moved, but are still officially considered his girlfriends. The sources I've looked at seem to confirm this, but other editors may have different sources so I am wary about changing the information on the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.198.210.232 (talk) 05:11, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cameos section[edit]

First, let me say that Wattlebird's contributions have been largely positive, I think. In looking at this page again, though, it seems to me that the cameos section actually violates WP:TRIVIA. It's unsourced and really unnecessary; the information there is more or less represented in the articles for each of the girlfriends. Further, the claim "As a result of the show's success, Madison, Marquardt and Wilkinson made cameo appearances in a variety of other films and television programs" really needs a source; otherwise it's just speculation. As such, I'm going to remove this section. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 14:06, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on The Girls Next Door. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:10, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]