Talk:Tugela Falls

South Africa Mid‑importance

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rivers: Waterfalls Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Waterfalls task force.

Coordinates[edit]

{{geodata-check}} The coordinates need the following fixes:

Write here

If I could tell what the coordinates were I wouldn't be looking here! I came looking for the lat/lng of Tugela Falls but I don't believe that the values here are exact enough though they are in the vicinity. This point is (according to the Google Maps click and corresponding view in Google Earth) not on a waterfall or even on a water route. The actual falls drop over an almost vertical cliff face.

174.7.25.37 (talk) 18:20, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. BrainMarble (talk) 23:27, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removing original research[edit]

This article had tons of original research, and was written in an unencyclopedic tone that suggested an editor trying to solve a puzzle in his/her own head. I removed all the material whose only source was an editor's own interpretation of google satellite imagery. I left in the remaining material that's sourced to multiple other blogs, although these aren't the strongest possible sources. If there's an article in a legitimate publication somewhere that addresses this supposed height controversy, it would be great to include mention of it. 67.188.32.155 (talk) 17:33, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]