Talk:Uniform Office Format

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Fundamental Differences?[edit]

How does UOF and ODF differ that it is difficult to merge the two formats? It's a nice idea to add into the article. --Kakurady 23:32, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See this comparison document. 202.78.240.7 (talk) 02:31, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OOo support?[edit]

article says:

OpenOffice.org from version 3 can open and save files in "Unified Office Format"...

well mine can't (3.1). can someone please verify and correct the article if you confirm. (feel free to delete my post afterwards) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.244.195.205 (talk) 20:41, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It appears the UOF support hasn't worked since OOo swapped out Saxon for libxslt. And nobody noticed for years - David Gerard (talk) 19:39, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Open standard[edit]

Is UOF open? Any sources to support this claim in the lede? Alexbrn 13:44, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

UOF 2.0?[edit]

This article is very out of date. The LibreOffice dev mailing list is talking about UOF 2.0 and whether to support it (consensus is "not without a written standard", which they can't find) [1] [2]. Does anyone have any references from the past five years? (The other language Wikipedia entries don't either.) - David Gerard (talk) 22:33, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Charles-H. Schulz notes "I'm not so sure whether it has any actual traction inside China and I have never even seen an UOF file, ever." Has anyone else? - David Gerard (talk) 11:52, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just did a Google search year by year. There is no new information I can find on Unified Office Format since 2009. Now searching on "GB/T20916" ... - David Gerard (talk) 19:06, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Found a few government tender documents requiring documentation in GB/T20916-2007, so someone is requiring it ... - David Gerard (talk) 19:33, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Uniform Office Format. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110710205729/http://www.evermoresw.com/index.php?option=com_docman&task=cat_view&gid=7&Itemid=169 to http://www.evermoresw.com/index.php?option=com_docman&task=cat_view&gid=7&Itemid=169

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:35, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]