Talk:Union Station (Ogden, Utah)

Trains: Stations Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	October 3, 2014

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.

This article lacks references.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Utah Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Utah portal This article is supported by WikiProject Utah (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled

Does anybody know why Frontrunner and bus connections are included in this article? it would be more appropriate to delete them and write an article for the Ogden Transit Center. D&RGW 223 (talk) 17:02, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My personal opinion is that one article is the best solution for now. I agree that once we have a fair amount of content about both topics (the historical depot and the modern replacement) that splitting makes sense. However, I loath and despise wikipedia articles that are only 2 sentences long, which is exactly what would happen if the article was split in its current state. Dave (talk) 16:01, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No need to worry about that now... There's more information on the station lobby than the whole transit center in the article.D&RGW 223 (talk) 16:53, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There were two separate references from Don Strack, from two separate pages, that probably should not have been combined. One dealt with the OUR&D, and the other with the depot itself.D&RGW 223 (talk) 16:53, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. I think I've fixed it now. Ntsimp (talk) 17:38, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

UTA?

Now that the history of the Union Station (and surrounding buildings) has been greatly updated and expanded, I suggest that the UTA Frontrunner and Bus information be either deleted or moved to a separate article. The Ogden Union Station is in no way connected to, funded or served by UTA or Frontrunner, and is a separate non-profit organization. Frontrunner has its own station to the south of the Union Station, and the Union Station is completely fenced off from the UTA tracks and facilities. D&RGW 223 (talk) 16:22, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

When asked last time, I objected that if the article was split into two (one for the UTA station, one for the historical depot) that both articles would be very short (stubs in wikipedia speak). I agree that now there is more than enough information for the article on the historical depot to survive as an independent article. The article for the UTA depot would be very short, however it would at least have route and ridership information, which is probably enough to ensure the article would survive and not be nominated for deletion. As such, I have no objections to moving the UTA content to Ogden (UTA station)(which is the naming convention for most similar articles), but my preference would be to find more info about the UTA depot before splitting the article. Dave (talk) 18:29, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Union Station (Ogden, Utah). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120209025151/http://www.rideuta.com/files/ogdenFactSheet.pdf to http://www.rideuta.com/files/ogdenFactSheet.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:15, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Union Station Sale and Development

Hi all. I’ve added the recent news that Ogden is looking to purchase Union Station and the surrounding land along with the plans for developing the station campus in coming years. I intend to help keep this page updated with the current and developing news as it happens. Please help me keep an eye on things and add notes as the situation plays out. Thanks for keeping this page alive! 73.63.123.98 (talk) 09:45, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]