Talk:Wellington Square, Chelsea
 | A fact from Wellington Square, Chelsea appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 January 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Did you know nomination[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 14:47, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
( )
- ... that James Bond lived next door to the site of a notorious double-murder in London's Wellington Square? Source: "The reason why we’re at Wellington Square is because this is where James Bond lived" https://www.the-tls.co.uk/articles/the-spies-who-lived-here-essay-william-boyd/"ATROCIOUS DOUBLE MURDER ... 24, Wellington-square" https://www.victorianlondon.org/crime/chelseamurder.htm and
- ALT1: ... that James Bond and the "most evil man in Britain" both lived in London's Wellington Square?
- ALT2: ... that the "wickedest man in the world" and the creator of Winnie-the-Pooh both lived in London's Wellington Square?
- Reviewed: not yet done
Created by Edwardx (talk) and Philafrenzy (talk). Nominated by Edwardx (talk) at 21:16, 24 December 2021 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
Article was created within seven days of nomination and has at least 1500 characters (2033). AGF on hook as the Boyd article puts Bond's residence in Wellington Square but does not give a precise address before requiring paid access. Will leave hook selection to approver. "Most evil man in Britain" quote is apparently self-professed. Not sure if that is better attributed as such if an ALT is used. QPQ not complete. For the nominator Edwardx, if you would like ALTs considered, please also provide the source for them here. Airborne84 (talk) 00:20, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
- Providing the source of any hook is optional as they are sourced in the article. ALT2 is the strongest IMHO. Philafrenzy (talk) 08:19, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
- Changed Alt2 to "wickedest man in the world" and double-sourced it. Philafrenzy (talk) 21:50, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Airborne84: @Edwardx: Please see updates above? Thank you. Storye book (talk) 19:11, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- Although I'll defer to the approver on the final hook selection, I agree with Philafrenzy that ALT2 is the strongest, partly because the hook and ALT1 mix fiction and non-fiction, but mostly because ALT2 seems an interesting juxtaposition. Although not required, it's possible to make it more concise by saying "and Winnie the Pooh's creator both lived". AGF on ALT2 as I cannot access the cited page in the Milne book ref. the Winnie the Pooh info.
Pending passing this nomination: QPQ incomplete.Thanks. Airborne84 (talk) 22:38, 4 January 2022 (UTC)- Note to both Edwardx and Philafrenzy: the QPQ should be supplied soon after the nomination is made, and in no event more than seven days after requested or required. That clock started ticking when the nomination was reviewed on 27 December. It's even more than seven days after 4 January's "QPQ incomplete". You have 48 hours before this is rejected; please supply the QPQ before then. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:56, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- @BlueMoonset: In case they don't answer quickly enough, am I allowed to donate one of my many current spare QPQs to Philafrenzy, who has contributed a lot to DYK recently? For example, I could donate this one: Template:Did you know nominations/Kip Andersen (filmmaker). Storye book (talk) 11:17, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Storye book, that's very generous of you. Editors are always welcome to donate QPQs if they wish to. If it happened a lot, though, it would increase our already high review deficit at DYK, so it's good that it doesn't happen too often. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:08, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- OK. Thank you for accepting it this time, anyway. Storye book (talk) 16:25, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you very much Storye book! I am busy researching tulips. Philafrenzy (talk) 21:06, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- You're welcome. Storye book (talk) 21:15, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note to both Edwardx and Philafrenzy: the QPQ should be supplied soon after the nomination is made, and in no event more than seven days after requested or required. That clock started ticking when the nomination was reviewed on 27 December. It's even more than seven days after 4 January's "QPQ incomplete". You have 48 hours before this is rejected; please supply the QPQ before then. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:56, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Although I'll defer to the approver on the final hook selection, I agree with Philafrenzy that ALT2 is the strongest, partly because the hook and ALT1 mix fiction and non-fiction, but mostly because ALT2 seems an interesting juxtaposition. Although not required, it's possible to make it more concise by saying "and Winnie the Pooh's creator both lived". AGF on ALT2 as I cannot access the cited page in the Milne book ref. the Winnie the Pooh info.
- @Airborne84: @Edwardx: Please see updates above? Thank you. Storye book (talk) 19:11, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- Changed Alt2 to "wickedest man in the world" and double-sourced it. Philafrenzy (talk) 21:50, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
As the QPQ is complete, changing status to DYK ready. Philafrenzy and I both recommend ALT2. Thanks all. Airborne84 (talk) 00:39, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Add grey tick for the bot. Storye book (talk) 11:23, 15 January 2022 (UTC)