Talk:Scouting and Guiding in Western Australia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merges[edit]

The merge of an article on the Waylen Bay Sea Scouts - an individual Scout Group is obvious. The guidelines do not support such articles and thay are always merged. I also support merging in the article on WA Sea Scouts. There is not even an Australia wide article on Sea Scouts. Merge both. So let me organise the discussion. --Bduke 22:37, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Western Australia Sea Scouts[edit]

  • Support merge. as above. --Bduke 22:37, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge Article Sea Scouts (Australia) would better serve the purpose because Sea Scouting in Australia is much smaller than Land Scouts. ...maelgwntalk 08:29, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. per Bduke --jergen 09:48, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Waylen Bay Sea Scouts[edit]

  • Support merge. as above. --Bduke 22:37, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment WHY not do a stub/subsidiary article for sea scouts in australia? the level of involvement in wa scouting articles is small - by merging all that now surely there is a tendency to discourage some work on wa scouting - which is sorely needed. SatuSuro 01:07, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge Local units shouldn't have they their own article per project policy.Sumoeagle179 14:27, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. I have copied the merge support above from Talk:Waylen Bay Sea Scouts as the discussion should be here. --Bduke 07:43, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge as policy ...maelgwntalk 08:29, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Policy. --jergen 09:49, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More Information[edit]

More information is needed on other sections and there activities such as cubs and joeys.Scoutfromaus (talk) 15:20, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Scouts Australia.svg[edit]

The image Image:Scouts Australia.svg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:52, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]