Talk:William Bulmer (printer)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Typography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TypographyWikipedia:WikiProject TypographyTemplate:WikiProject TypographyTypography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Copyright problem[edit]

Although the subject is notable, I see a copyright problem as much of the article was copy-pasted from an essay published in 1958. Since the essay was published in 1958, it may be still under copyright. If the author rewrites the article (even a minor stub is more than enough now), I'll be happy to remove the speedy deletion tag. — Pewfly (talk) 20:46, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation.[edit]

I have not read the 1958 article quoted, although I believe it to be by Peter Isaac. The content flagged as "copy and paste" has come from the Gentleman's Magazine article of 1830 and is itself quoted by Isaac. I am just about to put in the attribution for that (i.e. to the Gentleman's Magazine) Mmckenzie (talk) 20:54, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because the source of the apparent copyright infringement is a quotation from a publication of 1830 used in both documents. --Mmckenzie (talk) 21:00, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I note from your amendment that the apparent quotation was the line stating Thomas's membership of the House Carpenters' Company of Newcastle! which was from Isaac's expanded biography of Bulmer published in 1984.Mmckenzie (talk) 11:09, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bewick[edit]

The article mentions an engraver named John Bewick, but this name hyperlinks to a Catholic bishop of the same name. 172.250.243.234 (talk) 05:04, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]