Talk:Windows Installer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Computing / Software (Rated B-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Software (marked as Mid-importance).
 
WikiProject Microsoft / Windows (Rated B-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Microsoft Windows (marked as High-importance).
 

[edit]

The article states 'The user must have administrator privileges to complete the advertised installation...'. This is clearly contradicted in http://support.microsoft.com/kb/259459, which states 'The administrator uses elevated privileges to advertise the package. If a nonadministrator user then installs the application, the installation can run with elevated privileges.'

Unfortunately I have no direct evidence here: can anyone clarify this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.152.195.160 (talk) 23:20, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

uninstall[edit]

it might be worth mentioning how to uninstall Windows Installer packages --Spoon! 06:34, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

unattended?[edit]

MSI installers are great for network admins... someone with more wiki skills should add in that MSIs can be easily deployed through ADs. 67.9.38.116 22:46, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

lack of cross platform support and free software creators[edit]

It seems one disadvantage is lack of free software for creating MSI, also across platforms. With NSIS, you can build installer packages for Windows on a GNU/Linux system. With MSI, there does not seem to exist a solution for this as of yet. 10:59, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

WiX is a free package that allows you to build MSIs.
But WiX by itself does not create the actual MSI files. You still need the Windows Installer DLLs and/or tools. WiX is just a front-end. --TorLillqvist10:32, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
As for lack of cross-platform support, do you mean making install packages that will work on different platforms, or just the creation of the MSIs that you would like to be able to do on a non-Windows platform? --RenniePet 13:34, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
The latter, I assume.

Section 1.1 unclear[edit]

I have added the "cleanup-confusing " template, as it suggests both a "product", in this sense, may AND may not be more than a single program.Bettering the Wiki 03:56, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

I removed the template- it became clear, after rereading it.Bettering the Wiki 05:06, 31 July 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Goodone121 (talkcontribs)

Updates[edit]

I was surprised when my TL mentioned it also related to update menegement for windows.

Is that so?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.123.36.40 (talk) 17:48, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Self-Repair and Package Integrity are not mentioned as "Advantages" while "Disadvantages" has irrelevant and over-opinionated comments.[edit]

Why is self-repair not mentioned as a feature, if a poorly written install or uninstall toasts some portion of your Windows Installer managed installation, when the application is launched the stub MSI database is scanned and missing components are restored if an admin user is logged in, and if it is just a normal user, they will have a very specific error to call support with, and the application can be repaired by an admin user (even remotely using VBScript).

Also, any per-user settings for your application are propagated using this technology, and the user does not have to be an administrator for that to happen. Most enterprises deploy applications using a specific (domain or local) account. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.203.177.177 (talk) 16:21, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

what do they mean by "modern" windows[edit]

what do they mean, modern windows as in 3.1 up, 95 up, 98 up, 98 SE up, ME up, XP and up.91.110.155.13 (talk) 19:12, 14 July 2009 (UTC) The Windows Installer (previously known as Microsoft Installer[1]) is an engine for the installation, maintenance, and removal of software on "modern"Italic text Microsoft Windows systems. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.110.155.13 (talk) 19:14, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Multiple issues with 'Disadvantages' section[edit]

I've cleaned up some of the tagsoup created by User:FleetCommand, and have transferred his inline comments here for further discussion and action Little Professor (talk) 22:40, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi, Little Professor
Thanks for your efforts to improve the article readability. Yes, I confess the article readability was not very pleasing.
However, completely removing those tags is also wrong. Removing those tags is analogous to accusing someone of "committing crimes" and arresting him on that effect. So, I think we should leave mellow versions of those tags in place. One or two of them can also be ignored. In the end, they are just six tags. Six is not counted as tag bombing, is it?
Fleet Command (talk) 11:38, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Table of Contents link to Advertisement[edit]

I can't figure out why it's not working... on my browser, the Advertisement subsection is contained in the source for the page, but it is not displayed. Is this a problem for others as well?  Amit  ►  21:19, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Criticism section needs to be written[edit]

From what I have seen, the Microsoft fanboys don't like that the huge disadvantages of the ultra-stupid Windows Installer thing are ever mentioned. 189.62.49.216 (talk) 15:36, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Tool inclusion criteria[edit]

I would like to include a tool of mine called SharpSetup in the list of tools. As the tool has a paid version I do have a commercial interest in such inclusion. However, I really do think that the tool is more relevant to the list that 7-zip (which just happens to unpack msi files) or IsWix which according to codeplex stats got exactly two changesets this year and two discussion topics in its lifetime. So again: what are the inclusion criteria and does SharpSetup qualify? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grobelny (talkcontribs) 20:20, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

I'm going to trim the list down to only entries with either their own article and products from companies with their own articles. --Ronz (talk) 23:38, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

InstallShield is shareware?[edit]

In the table of installers near the end of the article, it is stated that InstallShield is shareware. They have a free demo version, but the main version costs big $$$! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.232.27.161 (talk) 19:44, 31 March 2014 (UTC)