Talk:Witold's Report

Poland Mid‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Jewish history Mid‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hungary Mid‑importance

	Hungary portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

European history Mid‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: European / Polish / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	Polish military history task force
	World War II task force

Grammar, punctuation[edit]

This article contains a non-standard (for English) apostrophe: ` instead of '. This page should be moved to "Talk:Witold's report" wanderingstan (talk) 22:57, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed a ton of grammar issues and made some minor corrections based on the Polish version of the article, which is doubtless more accurate. - Metalello (talk) 21:13, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Witold's Report. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100127100332/http://archive.timesonline.co.uk:80/tol/viewArticle.arc?articleId=ARCHIVE-The_Times-1948-03-05-03-008&pageId=ARCHIVE-The_Times-1948-03-05-03 to http://archive.timesonline.co.uk/tol/viewArticle.arc?articleId=ARCHIVE-The_Times-1948-03-05-03-008&pageId=ARCHIVE-The_Times-1948-03-05-03

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:20, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Name[edit]

Three years ago I moved this from Witold's Report to Pilecki's Report with the argument that last name is more informative, but I had second thoughts since. Witold's? Pilecki's? Witold Pilecki's? Also, singular Report or plural Reports? All variants are used, from what I can see in the sources... does anyone else have any preferences? Is there a variant that appears more common than the others? My query results based on GScholar query (note that it is imperfect and can contain occasional errors or unreliable sources/copies):

"Pilecki's Report": GScholar, 4. "Raport Pileckiego", 8.
"Pilecki's Reports": Gscholar, 4. "Raporty Pileckiego", 2.
"Witold's Report": GScholar, 17. "Raport Witolda", 20.
"Witold's Reports": GScholar, 0. "Raporty Witolda", 2.

This does suggest however, that the singular "Witold's Report" might be the best name. As such, I am reverting my older move and restoring the previous name. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:25, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 29 August 2023[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

There is a typo.

"underground military of rganization"

should read

"underground military organization" 76.127.55.185 (talk) 16:45, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done RudolfRed (talk) 01:18, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]