A fact from Xiaohong Rose Yang appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 April 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles
This article was created or improved during the VisibleWikiWomen edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Red project in March 2021. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:40, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
... that Xiaohong Rose Yang(pictured) conducted a genome-wide search for copy number variations to identify the first susceptibility gene for familial chordoma? Source: "Through a genome-wide search for copy number variations (CNVs), Yang identified the first susceptibility gene for familial chordoma—a germline duplication of the T gene that had eluded previous studies that focused on single nucleotide variants." [1]
Comment: Public domain text is used and identified in the article.
Created by TJMSmith (talk). Self-nominated at 01:46, 26 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Article is long and recent enough. There is text similar to the one in the National Cancer Institute, but this shouldn't be a problem if the content is in the public domain. Although I worry that the hook might be too technical for readers and a different phrasing could be considered, it is nevertheless an interesting and concise one, and a different hook could be too long. Overall, the article is in good condition and the hook is appropriate. I have gone ahead and linked the articles with others to remove the orphan tag. Best wishes! --NoonIcarus (talk) 15:19, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Article is long and recent enough. There is text similar to the one in the National Cancer Institute, but this shouldn't be a problem if the content is in the public domain. Although I worry that the hook might be too technical for readers and a different phrasing could be considered, it is nevertheless an interesting and concise one, and a different hook could be too long. Overall, the article is in good condition and the hook is appropriate. I have gone ahead and linked the articles with others to remove the orphan tag. Best wishes! --NoonIcarus (talk) 15:19, 31 March 2021 (UTC)