Talk:Yeronga Fire Station

Australia: Queensland B‑class Low‑importance

	Australia portal Yeronga Fire Station is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Firefighting Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firefighting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to firefighting on Wikipedia! If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.FirefightingWikipedia:WikiProject FirefightingTemplate:WikiProject FirefightingFirefighting articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Historic sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Copyvio[edit]

I just removed a large chunk of copyvio material, but reading this article and the source again, it appears that most (90+%) of the article is a copyvio. With the exception of a couple sentences in the history section, that entire section is also a word-for-word copy/paste from the source. I would remove the content in question, but this article would be nothing more than the lede and about 2 sentences. Revdel admin, please make note, and decide what to do about the remaining copyvio material.- Adolphus79 (talk) 15:28, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That material all appears to be taken from the Queensland Heritage Register which as the attribution template at the bottom of the article says was licenced under the CC-BY-3.0 AU licence. Therefore there is, I believe, no copyvio of that source. Side point the QHR is now licenced under CC-BY-4.0 which is still Wikipedia compliant. Nthep (talk) 11:23, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, my apologies... - Adolphus79 (talk) 12:41, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]