Template:Did you know nominations/Jane Dieulafoy
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:06, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Jane Dieulafoy[edit]
- ... that Jane Dieulafoy (pictured) received special permission from the French government to wear men's clothing in public?
Created/expanded by Joygerhardt (talk). Self nom at 15:37, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
| Format | Citation | Neutrality | Interest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 19:51, 8 September 2011 (UTC) | Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 19:51, 8 September 2011 (UTC) | Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 19:51, 8 September 2011 (UTC) | Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 19:51, 8 September 2011 (UTC) |
| Length | Newness | Adequate citations |
Formatted citations |
Reliable sources |
Neutrality | Plagiarism |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 19:51, 8 September 2011 (UTC) | Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 19:51, 8 September 2011 (UTC) | Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 19:51, 8 September 2011 (UTC) | Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 19:51, 8 September 2011 (UTC) | Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 19:51, 8 September 2011 (UTC) | Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 19:51, 8 September 2011 (UTC) | Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 19:51, 8 September 2011 (UTC) |
First ever full review. Definitely enjoyed myself learning about this lady. I'm having difficulty finding any reference to her campaigning for women to have a greater role in the military during the First World war in the cited article. Is it possibly in one of the others? Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 19:51, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Cheers! The relevant sentence in the source is: "In 1913-14, she militated for the enrollment of women in the military auxiliary services." If you think my sentence is too vague or misleading, feel free to modify it. :) Joygerhardt (talk) 21:28, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Ah, I see it now. Phraseology is fine. :) Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 22:23, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
