Template:Did you know nominations/Kollasmosoma sentum
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:02, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Kollasmosoma sentum[edit]
- ... that the time taken for the parasitoid wasp Kollasmosoma sentum to deposit its egg within the abdomen of an ant is as little as 0.052 seconds?
- Comment: QPQ under progress - Template:Did you know nominations/Podarcis hispanica
5x expanded by AshLin (talk). Self nominated at 16:25, 13 October 2014 (UTC).
- Comment Review under way. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 18:18, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- Partial review New enough (5X expansion confirmed), long enough. Clearly notable on these deadly efficient assassin bugs. Supported by ample sources. Duplication and plagiarism checking reveals no copyvio or close paraphrasing. QPQ pending Template:Did you know nominations/Podarcis hispanica, and once this is confirmed it will be clearly good to go. Hook and article are neutral, and the hook is very interesting (to me — opinion). Hook is amply supported by all of the many sources. Good to go. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:07, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- User:7&6=thirteen, Thank you for your contributions which merit a DYKMake as much as mine & which I have added to the nomination. But WP:COI would imply that your review is no longer valid & we need a new reviewer! Thanks, AshLin (talk) 14:02, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
- NEW REVIEWER REQUIRED HERE, Please! AshLin (talk) 14:02, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
- Article is long enough and has been expanded from 172 characters to 4500 = greater that 5X in required time. Article is neutral, cites sources with inline citations and is free of close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations and plagiarism. Hook is referenced. When QPQ is done, it will be a Good to Go.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 14:39, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
Good to Go. My QPQ was never used before and am submitting it to cover this article.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 14:46, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
- Doug, that's a really kewl act! You can have my QPQ when its done! AshLin (talk) 15:52, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks! - I was doing preparation ahead of time awhile back and had this one left over. Principle of Preparation = an article I created and is something I believe in alot.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 16:31, 16 October 2014 (UTC)