Template:Did you know nominations/Magnificat (Schütz)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk | contribs) at 10:29, 11 May 2021 (Fixed obsolete html tag Lint errors). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Montanabw(talk) 01:50, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Magnificat (Schütz)[edit]

Mary

  • Reviewed: Von Bock House
  • Comment: 27 January would be a good day, for a private birthday reason ;)

Created by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self nominated at 12:48, 24 January 2014 (UTC).

  • - the hook fact is not cited in the article. I see a table with three listed as in German and one in Latin - but nothing in the body of the article actually cites the composition of the three in German or the one in Latin. I did one small copyedit. The length is good, the time is fine. Earwig's tool shows no copyvios. Googling three random phrases showed no copyvio. Just needs some sort of citation to cover the hook facts (which I don't doubt) before it can be passed. Ealdgyth - Talk 00:36, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
  • I don't know where I would look, if the publication and appearance in the list of his works is not enough. (He wrote six, as I found out later, two are lost.) Perhaps a different hook?
ALT1 ... that a German Magnificat ends the last work by composer Heinrich Schütz, known as his swan song? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:34, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
ALT1 works fine. All good if ALT1 is used. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:19, 27 January 2014 (UTC)