Template:Did you know nominations/Percussion Concerto No. 2 (MacMillan)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 08:45, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Percussion Concerto No. 2 (MacMillan)[edit]
- ... that after Colin Currie was the soloist in the premiere of James MacMillan's Percussion Concerto No. 2, The Guardian wrote that it "confirm[ed] Currie's status as an athlete and a star"?
- Reviewed: Cross of Sorrow
Created by Jg2904 (talk). Nominated by Gerda Arendt (talk) at 21:13, 12 August 2015 (UTC).
New enough, long enough, neutral, verifiable, no copyvios or close paraphrasing detected. Hook is of the appropriate length, cited in-line, and interesting. I've copyedited the hook slightly to avoid the use of a colon and keep tenses consistent. A full QPQ is needed, as the one you provided does not mention a majority of the DYK criteria. If you've already done the work on the one you provided and just didn't write down what you checked, feel free to re-review that one to satisfy the requirement; no need to choose another nomination entirely. ~ RobTalk 09:53, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Look again, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:42, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Good to go. I understand you know what to check, but without it being written down, prep builders can't assume you remembered to check everything. It leads to the prep builder having to check every single criteria rather than the usual double-check of the hook. At that point, the prep builder might as well have reviewed the article. That doesn't fulfill the purpose of the QPQ. In addition to what you wrote in your new review, I'll assume you checked neutrality, verifiability, close paraphrasing, and that nom's QPQ. ~ RobTalk 12:01, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
