Template:Did you know nominations/Popcorn Time
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Allen3 talk 15:00, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
Insufficient progress toward resolving outstanding issues
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Popcorn Time[edit]
- ... that a Washington Post writer argued that Popcorn Time made torrents attractive to casual users?
Created by Disdero (talk). Nominated by ViperSnake151 (talk) at 01:21, 16 March 2014 (UTC).
Article is new enough, long enough, and deals with the subject neutral manner. The hook fact is stated in the article, but is not immediately followed by an inline citation to a reliable source. Also, the article contains a large number of quotations, perhaps too many for an encyclopedic entry. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 21:43, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
There has been no response here from ViperSnake151 despite talk-page notification, and the article has accumulated four bare URLs and two links to external pages within its text. Under the circumstances, it's time to close this unless the nominator takes immediate action. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:14, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
