Template:Did you know nominations/Rawalpindi Institute of Cardiology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 16:35, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Rawalpindi Institute of Cardiology[edit]

Created/expanded by Sahara4u (talk). Self nominated at 15:14, 10 April 2013 (UTC).

  • Hook is not supported by its sources. It states that Khan will take over the surgery department, and doesn't mention cardiac surgery. Furthermore, the DYK is written in future tense, while April 10 has already gone by.—♦♦ AMBER(ЯʘCK) 15:21, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
  • I don't think hooks that describe how many beds are in any hospital could be interesting. As far as I know, none of those numbers are spectacular, and I would therefore decide against ALT1. The original hook is fine, provided that the "cardiac" part goes out of both the hook and the article. Like this:
Now I need someone to reassess this.—♦♦ AMBER(ЯʘCK) 16:01, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Article
PASSED New - Most major creation of content occurred from 9-11 April 2013, with it being submitted on 10 April for its initial review
PASSED Long enough - Article on the 11 Apirl had 455 words, making up 2858 characters of prose
PASSED Within policy - Appears to be neutral, cited to reliable sources using inline citations, with no apparent issues of copyright concerns
N/A BLP- Article is about an organization, therefore a BLP tag is not necessary.
  • Hook - ALT2
PASSED Format - Hooks is 18 words long, made up of 122 characters
HOLD Content - Although the hook is interesting, and cited in the article, it is not neutral. The word "renowned" is listed in WP:PEA and is a word to watch, and should be removed in order for the DYK to pass assessment. Hook is interesting, cited in the article, and worded neutrally.
  • Other
PASSED QPQ - Nominator assessed another DYKN
N/A Images - No images used in the article
--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 07:13, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Removed "renowned". Zia Khan 11:34, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
With renowned removed, ALT2 appears to pass requirements.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 13:23, 8 May 2013 (UTC)