Template:Did you know nominations/Sidewalks (album)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 08:31, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Sidewalks (album)

5x expanded by HumanxAnthro (talk). Self-nominated at 03:19, 14 April 2022 (UTC).

  • Comments by Tbhotch

General eligibility:

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: "Sidewalks holds an aggregate score of 62/100 on Metacritic based on 19 reviews, indicating a mixed critical reception." >59 means mixed. In Metacritic, 62 means "Generally favorable reviews". For some reason, the Billboard chart links lead to a 404, "Sorry, the page you were looking for cannot be found" page. Besides that, the article was formerly a stub article with little substance. The hook is interesting. Everything is attributed to a source. QPQ is unrequired as this is your fourth nomination. Earwig's marks a "Violation Unlikely 17.4%", but it's just the quotes. If the issues mentioned are resolved, then it can be approved. (CC) Tbhotch 22:25, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Tbhotch, issues have been resolved. 👨x🐱 (Nina CortexxCoco Bandicoot) 01:08, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
I can't see any major issue, so it's good to go. (CC) Tbhotch 02:12, 3 May 2022 (UTC)