Template talk:Did you know/Agriculturalism

Agriculturalism[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk)

... that the Chinese philosophy of Agriculturalism advocated that leaders should not be paid by the government, and should instead earn their wages from working in the fields with peasants?

5x expanded by Mathematicmajic (talk). Self nom at 04:33, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:

Hook

Length, format, content rules: --William S. Saturn (talk) 15:26, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Source: --William S. Saturn (talk) 15:26, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Interest: --William S. Saturn (talk) 15:26, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image suitability, if applicable:
ALT hooks, if proposed:

Article

Length: --William S. Saturn (talk) 15:26, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Vintage: --William S. Saturn (talk) 15:26, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sourcing (V, RS, BLP): --William S. Saturn (talk) 15:26, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutrality: --William S. Saturn (talk) 15:26, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Plagiarism/close paraphrasing: --William S. Saturn (talk) 15:26, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Copyvio: --William S. Saturn (talk) 15:26, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious faults in prose, structure, formatting: --William S. Saturn (talk) 15:26, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments/discussion: Probably best to remove the 'should' from the hook, and replace the 'and should' with 'but'. Also you need to review an article.--William S. Saturn (talk) 15:26, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For clarity. Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:12, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will promote this article now. For the sake of having a reviewed article, we can use this old review of mine of Broken Hill Massacre. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:39, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]