Umbilicus rupestris: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

18 November 2023

16 June 2023

17 June 2022

24 March 2022

10 March 2022

9 March 2022

9 March 2021

3 March 2021

30 January 2021

4 January 2021

  • curprev 22:5422:54, 4 January 202177.164.133.132 talk 4,904 bytes +33 Salisbury's name was a nomen invalidum because he cited "Cotyledon umbilicus L." in the synonymy, making this a superfluous name. This doesn't affect the use as a basionym by Dandy, and Umbilicus rupestris still remains valid. undo

30 December 2020

  • curprev 21:5021:50, 30 December 202077.164.133.132 talk 4,871 bytes −96 "Umbilicus gaditanus" is the name of an accepted taxon, see http://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:276951-1; Linnaeus wrote:" Cotyledon umbilicus ♀"; these symbols should be taken as an integral part of the name, and are to be transcribed, in this case as "-veneris", see ICN Art. 23.3 https://www.iapt-taxon.org/nomen/pages/main/art_23.html undo

4 October 2020

19 May 2020

28 March 2020

11 February 2020

26 September 2019

9 July 2019

14 April 2019

26 February 2019

21 January 2019

29 September 2018

15 July 2018

14 May 2018

22 March 2018

20 December 2017

3 November 2017

7 January 2016

31 August 2015

20 August 2015

31 July 2015

16 February 2015

13 November 2014

11 May 2014

4 April 2014

4 February 2014

7 January 2014

2 September 2013

27 February 2013

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)