User talk:128.244.38.5

Hi, as the original author of this article, I am fascinated by the changes over the years. I'm curious to know who contributed to this article. thank you, John Braman 858 449 0012

about Jerk (physics)

Just in case your statement at top level refers to the mentioned article ... Last year I did did some bigger extensions and the article achieved a higher ranking, but only barely, because of citations being considered marginal, whereas the content was judged better.

I do not oppose to any edits (besides vandalism :) ), I just want to mention that the whole sections deals with the norms of the vector entities only, so I'd prefer speed to velocity. Furthermore, I'm not sufficiently informed about the linearisation you have in mind. Perhaps it would be enlightening if you could supply a link to some content you refer to.

Best regards, and I hope you liked what you saw. :) Purgy (talk) 08:49, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 13 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Stanford Graduate School of Business page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Brandon Irvin concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Brandon Irvin, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Brandon Irvin

Hello, 128.244.38.5. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Brandon Irvin".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. samtar ^{t} 13:27, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

February 2023

Hello, I'm Moops. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Torah have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. — Moops ^⋠T⋡ 18:29, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Torah. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Moops ^⋠T⋡ 18:31, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Torah shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. tgeorgescu (talk) 18:37, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2023

Hello, I'm Riverbend21. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Miles Thompson have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Riverbend21 (talk) 16:48, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

---