User talk:173.54.162.95

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 2022[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Saturday Night Live (season 1). When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Blue Riband► 13:14, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Checkpoint Charlie, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Blue Riband► 11:50, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Checkpoint Charlie, you may be blocked from editing. Even if the maintenance template is dated (2017 in the case) it should not be removed with improving the references or explaining how the issue has been fixed. Blue Riband► 03:26, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Charlie Finley. You also removed the template from Stump the Schwab. Even if the templates are years old, please do not removed them without addressing the problem or explaining your actions. Blue Riband► 23:15, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Blue Riband► 02:56, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ks0stm (TCGE)  If you reply here, please ping me by using {{re|Ks0stm}} in your reply.  06:23, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
I have extended your block to 72 hours, since you have persisted with completely unacceptable behavior. Cullen328 (talk) 06:40, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How long will my block be if I asked you to lick my nuts? 173.54.162.95 (talk) 16:53, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Mako001. I noticed that in this edit to Beverly Hills Cop III, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 22:02, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are enough citations (54) and 8 of them were added after the tag was added 173.54.162.95 (talk) 22:09, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Previous names of trans people[edit]

I've reverted your edits to O. J. Simpson murder case regarding Zoey Tur. Per our guideline MOS:DEADNAME:

Outside the main biographical article, generally do not discuss in detail changes of a person's name or gender presentation unless pertinent. Where a person's gender may come as a surprise, explain it on first occurrence, without overemphasis. Avoid confusing constructions (Jane Doe fathered a child) by rewriting (e.g., Jane Doe became a parent). In articles on works or other activity by a living trans or non-binary person before transition, use their current name as the primary name (in prose, tables, lists, infoboxes, etc.), unless they prefer their former name be used for past events. If they were notable under the name by which they were credited for the work or other activity, provide it in a parenthetical or footnote on first reference; add more parentheticals or footnotes only if needed to avoid confusion.

Since nothing about a woman flying a helicopter is "confusing", I don't think it's necessary to mention Tur's former name at all, but even if it were, the correct procedure would be a parenthetical or footnote, not to refer to her by that name. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 19:20, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]