User talk:174.164.5.188

Welcome!

Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! --🐦DrWho42👻 08:31, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Empty fields

Please stop adding empty fields and uncited additions. We all appreciate your enthusiasm, but rules state that sources must be cited, and fields that are unpopulated are to be removed.

Also, please double check your grammar and punctuation. Some of your additions have been incorrect. SausageMcFlurry (talk) 00:59, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Once again, please refrain from adding empty fields. this edit was particularly problematic — FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they) (talk) 08:04, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Stop adding sections that you apparently have no intention of filling in. You have been asked not to do this several times and you continue. This disruptive behaviour can lead to a block from editing. ... discospinster _talk 21:39, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Laura's Star

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Laura's Star, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:38, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Citation errors

You have made several edits claiming that movies have received a critical rating from Rottentomatoes with only one critical review. Rottentomatoes only lists critical review aggregates after a movie has received at least five critical reviews. The numbers you are citing as critical reviews are audience reviews, which in some instances are drastically different than the critical reviews. SausageMcFlurry (talk) 18:24, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

September 2023

Hello, I'm Felida97. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Bloons, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Felida⁹⁷ (talk) 05:09, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Key signature of pop songs

The key signature of a pop song is almost always unimportant to the song. Other keys are just as valid for singers who want to adapt the song for their vocal range. It doesn't make it a different song.

You have been writing that the song was "composed" in a certain key, but you don't actually know whether that is true in every case. The song may have been written in one key then transposed to a new key for the singer's comfort. The true statement would be that the sheet music for the song displays a certain key signature. Binksternet (talk) 03:54, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

---