User talk:Aaronm8822

December 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Flyer22. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Norman Reedus because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 01:19, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Norman Reedus. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:52, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Norman Reedus, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Norman Reedus was changed by Aaronm8822 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.949325 on 2014-12-18T20:53:12+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:53, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Norman Reedus. Sock (~~tock~~ talk) 20:55, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 20:59, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]