User talk:Anittas/ArchiveII

Criztu :)

Hey, I'm curious: what's the story behind User:Criztu, if you know it? He had some consistently wacky ideas, and was apparently obsessed with the Asiatic tribes: Massagetae, Iranians, Turks, Avars, etc. etc. Know anything about that character? Peace. -Alexander 007 10:27, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

I know him from the Illyrian forum, the Romanian section. I was a Mod and we got into fights a lot; he allied him self with the Bulgarians. I had Romanian allies. Well, just some goofy fights which resulted in him leaving the forum after the administrator removed his moderator status. It only lasted 24-hours. He had some very wacky ideas. --Anittas 18:42, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

RFM

Hello Anittas, please see this. I apologize in advance. Redwolf24 (talk) 23:59, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

Potential 3RR violation on Moldovan language

Greetings, You and User:Christopher Sundita have been engaging in a revert conflict on Moldovan language. At this point, you have reverted Christopher Sundita's reversions 4 times in the last 24 hours. You are in violation of Wikipedia:Three-revert rule. There have been a number of reversions to the same content over the last several days. I strongly urge you to take the dispute to Talk:Moldovan language, rather than continue this revert conflict. Continued violation of the 3RR rule may result in a temporary block on you. Please, be careful. Thank you. All the best, --Durin 16:31, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

Dude, I haven't reverted that article in 2 days; and I didn't violate the 3RR rule. What the hell are you babbling about? --Anittas 16:33, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

Show me where I reverted the article in the last 24h.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Moldovan_language&action=history

--Anittas 16:38, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

With regards to "babbling", please observe Wikipedia:Civility. Thank you. As to the 4 reverts these were:

• 12:10, 24 October 2005 Anittas (rv - it is a reliable source)
• 00:18, 24 October 2005 Anittas (rv - I have the right to use sources.)
• 22:39, 23 October 2005 Anittas (rv - the word liberated is not used in my source. I don't know what you're talking about.)
• 18:23, 23 October 2005 Anittas

The first three of these were reverts by you. The fourth would need more review on my part to see if it really was a revert or not. At this point, that is unnecessary. I wanted to point out to you that you are in danger of being blocked under WP:3RR if such actions continue in the future, and that the dispute should be taken to Talk:Moldovan language. I hope you will heed the well-meant advice. --Durin 16:44, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

I have taken the dispute to RfM, ANI, RfA, and most recently, TINMC. Nothing helped, so far. Instead of picking on 3RR rule, which is in the past, try see the big picture. I'm being stopped from using a legitimate source! --Anittas 16:59, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

• I am not arguing the validity or lack thereof of your source. I am not party to the debate, nor am I knowledgeable enough on the material to comment in specific. The first step in dispute resolution should be attempts at discussion. Talk:Moldovan language is a highly appropriate place for that. I realize, and saw, you went to the various places you noted. You request would be best served by starting with Talk:Moldovan language so the nature of the dispute can be discussed. Work by gaining concensus, not by reverting each other. If this fails, there are other means. As time allows, I will monitor progress on this. --Durin 17:05, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

I have two simple questions for you. Try to be as honest as possible.

1 If you are in a forest and you meet a wolf that wants to bite you in the ass; do you invite him to discuss the dispute on your talkpage?; and

2. Is it possible for someone to stop someone else from using a source? If not, why do we even have this discussion? To me, this is crystal clear. Can I go to an article and remove a legatimate source? Wouldn't other people revert the article and call it vandalism?

I can do this, as an example, if you want me to. Pick an article with sources, and I'll remove one of those sources. Let us then wait and see how people react.

How is it even possible to tolerate such behaviour? If we were in North Korea, I would've understand. I am right, they are wrong. There is no gray area. People should be allowed to use legitimate sources - and that source is very legitimate. If you look at their arguments, you will see that they've changed directions at least three times. --Anittas 17:25, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

First, editors on Wikipedia should not be regarded as wolves intent on attacking you. From an outside perspective, above the trees if you will, I see two people in a dispute. I see this dispute has not been discussed on the article's talk page. Instead, I see the dispute taken to revert wars, mediation, and etc. As I previously noted, the first step should be using the article's talk page. Is there a reason you do not want to do this? If so, what is it?

Second, your suggestion would violate Wikipedia:Don't disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. On those grounds alone, it would be reverted by an observant editor.

I am not here to debate the merits of your case against these two editors. I am here to assist you in resolving the dispute. Your dispute is not with me. Again, I urge you to take the dispute to the article's talk page. Once that avenue has been exhausted as a reasonable means of resolving the dispute, other avenues will have a much easier time taking action to assist in resolving the dispute. Rather than respond to me here, I suggest you spend that time creating an entry on Talk:Moldovan language outlining the dispute and why you feel your edit should be included. This will also provide an opportunity for people who are familiar with the article to comment. Taking the dispute to the various places you have puts it in front of people who, though they might be very capable in dispute resolution, have little or no knowledge of the subject and thus can not judge the merits of each side without more discussion prior to bringing it to their attention. --Durin 17:47, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

Node has been vandalizing Romanian articles for a lifetime. He even opened a Moldovan wiki (he doesn't speak the language) only to cause grief to the Romanians. To try and convince him of the right thing is like trying to convince Kim Jin II to become a nun. I might try and discuss this with him and his new-found friend, but past experience tells me this will be a waste. My question still stands: can someone stop someone else from using a legitimate source? I'm not speaking about this case; I'm speaking from a general point of view. --Anittas 18:11, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

• The legitamacy of the source is disputed, thus the question as it applies to this particular case is moot. Please take the dispute to Talk:Moldovan language. I look forward to your addition there, along with rationale. --Durin 18:22, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
• For reference, Wikipedia:Resolving disputes. --Durin 19:05, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

Your recent request on Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal

Dear Anittas: The Cabal would be happy to assist you in resolving this matter, regardless of any objections raised by specific parties in the dispute. Primarily, we need to try to effect some sort of either consensus amongst editors, or agreement for compromise (the former being preferable) amongst the individual editors, and to come to an understanding over this sources issue. Regardless of where a debate is currently in progress, I am sure that we can at least provide a neutral environment for amicable exchange to occur and with some luck and cooperation from other dispute participants I am confident we should be able to bring this to an end. What I think I would consider the best course of action would be if all parties were to make a short statement of their perspective of the scenario on a Mediation Cabal discussion page, and then I would do my best in order to find an agreed resolution to meet the opinions of the majority, in addition to maintaining moderation over the page. Let me know on your thoughts regarding this. Best regards, --NicholasTurnbull | (talk) (e-mail) (cabal) 03:51, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

Liberation of Bessarabia...

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Moldovan_language&diff=26054211&oldid=25562452

So nu, who is the liar now?

Cu respect. Node

You are the liar. I never used those words. I added my fragment; then you reverted the whole thing, including my fragment that I added. Then I reverted the article back because I wanted my fragment back; and that included the version where the word "liberated" was used, but by another user. You cried, so instead of reverting again, I just added my fragment, in which you again reverted. It was user:Dpotop who used the word "liberated". See for your self:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Moldovan_language&diff=25510030&oldid=25496914

You lied. --Anittas 21:59, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

That's a twisting of facts. No matter how you put it, there is one revision where it didn't exist, and then in the next revision, which was by YOU, it was there. So regardless of who added it originally, YOU added it back. You say "Then I reverted the article back because I wanted my fragment back; and that included the version where the word... was used". So, how was I supposed to know that you didn't really want "liberate" to be there? You reverted my edit 100%, and by doing so you re-inserted the word. How was I supposed to know whether or not that was intentional? Given your previous Romanian nationalist extremism, wasn't it a reasonable assumption? So, no matter how much you lie about it, it remains: as proven by that rev, you did place the word "liberated" into a place where it wasn't in the previous revision, whether or not it was intentional. --Node 07:49, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

You're the MAN, keep fighting Anittas

stop the fucking russian Serhiodudnic and Node, they will be stopped, the fucking bastards . (unsigned: 203.162.17.78)

Thanks; and if you want to help, create an account. --Anittas 18:42, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

Omule, nu-i injura pe aia in tot felul. Nu o sa mai avem noi credibilitate, daca ne purtam asa. --Anittas 18:45, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

Re: Iaşi

Sigur, putem spune, doar dacă ai o sursă reputabilă care zice aşa. Sursele pe care le-am văzut pînă acum nu spun nicăieri că Iaşul ar fi fost vreun moment capitala Principatelor unite (în afară de perioada 1917-1919). IulianU 18:55, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

Pînă în 1862 cele două Principate au avut guverne şi administraţii distincte, iar Cuza "făcea naveta" între Bucureşti şi Iaşi. Ca urmare nu se poate vorbi de capitala Principatelor Unite pînă în 1862. Organismele unite (Curtea de Casaţie, şi care-or mai fi fost) aveau sediul la ... Focşani. Iar www.iasi.ro nu este pagina oficială a Iaşului, este un sit privat, făcut acum 5 ani de către DNTis. Nu văd nicăieri pe el girul Primăriei Iaşi. Aşa pot şi eu scrie pe situl meu că Budapesta e capitala judeţului Vaslui; asta nu-nseamnă că devine automat adevărat. IulianU 19:14, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

Bine, deci de facto, si Iasi si Bucuresti au fost centre de administratie - adica capitale, intre 1859-1862. Putem scri asta? --Anittas 19:24, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

Da, asta e altceva :-) Fă tu schimbarea în articol, şi pe urmă voi mai comenta dacă va fi cazul. Thx, IulianU 19:27, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

Arată bine, mulţumesc ;-) Da, îmi amintesc despre menţiunea în legătură cu despăgubirea care trebuia dată Iaşului. Dacă nu mai este, trebuie adăugată din nou. Însă ai grijă să citezi o carte, sau un articol de ziar, ceva, orice unde să putem verifica informaţia. IulianU 20:46, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

Created moldovan Wikipedia

Also you said I created the Moldovan Wikipedia just to cause Romanians grief.

Well, I couldn'tve done it just to cause Romanians grief, because I'm not the one who created it!! It already existed! I posted most of the content, yes, but I wouldn'tve spent any effort if it didn't already exist. --Node 09:10, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

Moldova

Omule. Nu vandaliza pagina Moldovei. Please. serhio ^talk 08:10, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

Unde ma vezi tu pe mine vandalizand? --Anittas 08:12, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

Request for Comments

A Request for Comments has been posted that you may want to respond to. Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Pop_music_issues Robert McClenon 17:05, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

Umm, I don't know what to say there. --Anittas 17:19, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

Girls

Hi Anittas.

I have no problem with girls, in fact, I like them. Perhaps not in the same way that some people like them, but I like them nevertheless. Now, I'd like to ask you, what problem do you have with boys?

Cheers. --Node 04:04, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

HI ANNITAS

Glad to know you. I've seen your edits on Moldovan language and I am fully agree with them, keep editing and you have my full support. Impreuna suntem o forta. Bonaparte  talk & contribs

Hi Annitas! I've recently added some edits on the Moldovan language talk page, see if it is wright and of course I need your support. Bonaparte  talk & contribs

Thankx! We will continue of course. Just stay sharp. I reserve my rights to strike anytime when they least expect it. Fii pe faza!. Bonaparte  talk & contribs

Salut! Please have a look on my latest edits on Moldovan language and recent proposal of Dpotop to file a vandalism report on the systematic deletion of the page by Node ue. We need your support.  Bonaparte  talk & contribs

Hi there! Soon I will need your help, just stay sharp.  Bonaparte  talk & contribs

Hi Anittas, please check this out Transnistria and also on the talk page, your help is needed!  Bonaparte  talk & contribs

Anittas you were great! Thankx for your help! Suntem o forta. Bonaparte  talk & contribs

Suntem o forta! By the way just look at the [[1]] you might discover something really nice about the "all-powerful entity made of pure energy" namly Mark Williamson also known as Node. Tot inainte! Bonaparte  talk & contribs

Am vazut. E mai bine daca te calmezi putin, daca mai vrei sa fii o forta. Domnul Mikka e cu ochii pe noi. --Anittas 22:04, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

Your mediation request re. Moldovan language

Dear Anittas: Further to your mediation request on Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal, I have left messages on the talk pages of the two users you named in your request; I will proceed further based on their willingness to enter mediation, and their viewpoints on the particular issue. The request is thus awaiting response from the two users before proceeding. I must apologise for the length of time it took me to process your request - I have been very busy lately, and as a consequence have neglected my work at the TINMC somewhat, for which I am very sorry. If there are any issues which you wish to discuss with me in private, feel free to send me a Wikipedia e-mail, and anything you say in private communication with me will be treated in the strictest of confidence. Thank you, and best regards, --NicholasTurnbull | (talk) 02:20, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

Your blocking

I will block everyone who will engage in non-article-related word battles. You just happened to fall under the first salvo. I have nothing personal agaist you. This exchange of hateful speech must be quenched. Personally, I am not offended by any outbursts; I am just laughing. But this way of discussion that happens around Limba moldoveneacsa just a waste of time and does not help to reach a mutually agreeable version.

Once again: my blocking has nothing to do with justice; it is an action to put the fire down. Therefore I will not go back and track who started badmouthing or who is guilty. I have better things to do. Bun ramas. mikka (t) 22:26, 13 November 2005 (UTC) -- cere adresa @ de la alex :D

Moldavian rulers

Mai Anittas, daca vrei sa scrii despre domnitorii moldoveni, te rog sa mergi la link-ul: ro:Listă de domnitori ai Moldovei ,unde o sa gasesti articole facute de mine si care sunt reale, nu povesti! Informatiile sunt luate dintr-o enciclopedie.--Dacodava

Mai fraiere ce ai scris in mare parte sunt tampenii mari. Radauti nu a fost niciodata capitala Moldovei. Bogdan I nu a fost trimis de regele ungariei. El a plecat din proprie initiativa spre Moldova si i-a alungat pe urmasii lui Dragos care erau sprijiniti de regele ungariei!!! Informatiile mele sunt dintr-o enciclopedie istorica daca ai auzit de asa ceva, scrisa intre 1936 - 1940.--Dacodava

In orice carte serioasa o sa vezi ca singurele capitale ale Moldovei au fost: Baia, Siret, Suceava si Iasi. Bogdan I nu a fost trimis de nimeni, el si oamenii lui au plecat din Maramures deoarece se saturasera de unguri si voiau sa fie independenti. Te rog sa intelegi ca informatiile le am dintr-o enciclopedie istorica scrisa la 1940!--Dacodava

Faptul ca Radauti a fost curte domneasca nu inseamna ca a fost capitala. Asa si in timpul lui Stefan, Bacaul a fost curte domneasca, cea mai importanta resedinta a lui ptr ca era locul lui de nastere, dar nici Bacaul nu poate fi numita capitala. Trebuie sa mentinem adevarul!--Dacodava

Finger

Hi Anittas,

Yes, I have my thumb in my mouth. Most people found the reason very quickly and thought it quite risqué, but I'll leave you to figure it out for yourself. --Node 06:35, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

That's exactly what it is. Poor lighting conditions add to the situation. --Node 06:40, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

Well, that's a very difficult question to answer. Obviously, a man that is attractive to one woman may not be attractive to another -- what is attractive varies from person to person. Some women may like "manly men", others might like more sensitive men. It's the same way with homosexuals -- not everybody goes for the same thing. So, the short answer would be "yes". --Node 06:49, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

That's a difficult question to answer, and I was looking for a Wikipedia article that addresses it, but couldn't find one. Generally, what you're referring to is known as "gay culture" or "the gay subculture" which, although associated with homosexuality by many people, doesn't nessecarily go hand-in-hand with it. I'm not sure what the reasons are for the shifts in trends. However, I should point out that many homosexuals have rejected "gay culture" for various reasons. I, for one, do not wear tight pink clothes and carry around a purse. Rejection of gay culture seems to be a larger phenomenon over time. One theory relating to this is that gay culture developed in the first place as a reaction to the rejection of gays by society in general, and as societal acceptance of homosexuality grows, there seems less and less of a need to have a separate "culture" or subculture. --Node 07:29, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

Blocare

Am cerut blocarea paginii în interesul nostru. Altfel, Node vine şi face tot felul de editări care nu pot fi monitorizate. Când era blocată pagina, Mikka mi-a introdus foarte multe propoziţii adevărate despre "limba moldovenească", acum Node le revertează. Ronline 10:44, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

You may support the action Vandalism in Progress against Node ue

Oh Yes! Support now!

You may support the Vandalism in Progress against Node

• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vandalism_in_progress/IP_Severe#November_2005

Maybe so will he will learn to cooperate first.

Actually

You actually have most of this wrong. The first time, *I* did not protect the page (and protect is the right word, not block). Mikka did. I then unprotected it after a day because a day is usually all we give pages that have been protected for vandalism reasons. And then I reprotected the page after pleading from Ronline. Did I criticize Mikka? Yes, because it's against policy for admins to edit protected pages. I still stand by that. I'm still not real happy about the whole thing since you guys should've been using the dispute resolution process instead of making up the rules as you go along. That's why I am only giving you guys a couple of days to do it this way. And I did not block the anon because "he wanted Node blocked". Read my reasoning on the talk page and also on the Vandalism in Progress page. I blocked him because he was being disruptive. His posts did not add a thing to the discussion. All it did was fan the flames. He was given 3 chances to post the correct notice on ViP. When he finally got it right, it was not really a request for banishment. It was just another attack against Node. We have policies against personal attacks...and when that's all he did...then he's a vandal and should be blocked. You aren't using those tactics. And I'm not "involved". I'm a neutral 3rd party who is trying to help you guys get this worked out. I'm not blaming anyone. But we have to stay within certain guidelines and the anon editor was not doing that. --Woohookitty^{(cat scratches)} 14:15, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

And if you don't believe me, [[2]] is the protection log. It shows when the page was protected and when it was unprotected. --Woohookitty^{(cat scratches)} 14:29, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

Here is the policy on admins editing protected pages. It's pretty clear. But I"m trying to give you guys leeway because it looks like progress was being made. I actually have a fear that another admin is going to swoop in and overrule me since what I'm allowing is not exactly policy. :) But as long as you guys agree to work together, I don't see any problem with letting you guys discuss it for a couple of days and see what you come up with. And honestly, if Tuesday comes and progress is being made but you aren't quite done, I'll probably let it go for a bit longer. One of the points I was trying to make is that if think that Node is being disruptive, start the Dispute resolution process on his behavior. Again, I'm not directing or taking sides...just trying to give you guys all of the options since it doesn't look like any of you are all that familiar with our policies (which is why admins are here to help out). If you have any other questions, let me know. --Woohookitty^{(cat scratches)} 14:58, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

Libertarianism

Salut. Da, eu sunt libertarian, mai mult în sfera socială decât cea economică. În economie, totuşi, suport structuri ca şi cota unică şi politica PNL. Trăiesc în Oradea, în România! (dece ai crezut Germania :) Ronline 05:21, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

Ronline for Admin

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Ronline and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#Ronline . I have nominated Ronline to be Administrator for English Wikipedia. Let's vote for him! Bonaparte  talk & contribs

Moldova şi Iaşi

Salut Anittas! În primul rând - îmi plac discuţiile acestea. Ne cunoaştem mai bine, şi chiar dacă nu agreem, sunt interesante. Să răspund la întrebări:

• Tu ai fost la Oradea? Sau la Satu Mare? Eu nu am fost la Iaşi fiind că nu am avut de ce. Da, este oraş minunat. Da, are importanţă culturală pentru români. Şi, da, voi merge. Îmi place foarte tare să merg cu trenul dar efectiv nu am avut de ce să merg la Iaşi.
• Da, unirea cu Mo ar costa foarte mult. Eu unul aşi prefera dezvoltarea României decât unirea cu Moldova. N-aş vrea ca Moldova să ne tragă în jos. Sânge a curs, ruşii au furat Basarabia, dar ce să facem? Unirea este bună, dar încă nu prea este posibilă. Crezi că ar fi bine să fie în România aşa mulţi ruşi, găgăuzi şi ucrainieni? Moldova s-a rusificat, vrem nu vrem. Şi acum se românizează. Dar acel proces durează timp. Şi până când persoana ca Voronin vor mai exista, unirea nu va fi posibilă!

Nu ştiu de ce nu îţi place Bucureştiul. Eu simt ceva în Bucureşti care nu am simţit nici unde pe lume. Are un caracter foarte unic acel oraş! Plus că, vrem nu vrem, este capitala României şi cred că cu cât Bucureştiul este mai promovat şi mai frumos, cu cât România are la rândul ei o imagine mai frumoasă. Ronline 12:08, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

Am trecut prin Oradea odata; nu a fost cine stie ce. Am fost in Arad de doua ori si am vazut orfani care vai de capul lor. Asa ca si in Bucuresti. Arad nu e oras prea mare, dar avea orfani care se drogau cu pungele alea...

Asa ceva nu gasesti in Moldova. Da, Bucurestiul este mare buric acuma, dupa ce a furat din toata tara ca sa se dezvolte. Acuma nu le doare nici in --- de Moldova. Plus ca bucurestenii sunt oameni aroganti. Majoritatea din ei. Orasele din Transilvania sunt construite de Austrieni si ungari; si de romani. Iasul e cu totul romanesc. Braila a fost construita de turci, rusi si romani. Iasul numai si numai de romani! Bucurestiul a furat. Asta e. Stefan cel Mare a gresit cand a cucerit Bucurestiul si ia dat foc. Trebuia sa-i dea foc, iar dupa aceaia sa dea cu plugul prin sare, cum au facut romanii cu Carthage. :D --Anittas 12:23, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

Da, într-adevăr în oraşe ca Arad (şi Oradea) sunt mulţi copii de stradă şi oameni fără casă, dar nu atât de mulţi ca şi în Bucureşti. Precis nu găseşti acelaşi lucru în Moldova? Nord-estul este cea mai săracă regiune din România, deşi într-adevăr am mai auzit de la un prieten care a fost în Piatra Neamţ că nici acolo nu prea a văzut semne de sărăcie... că sărăcia era mai ascunsă. Totuşi, cum este posibil să nu fie aceşti copii de stradă dar să fie această regiuni cu cele mai mici venituri? Poate din cauza agriculturii răspândite? Asta înseamnă că în oraşele moldoveneşti lumea are salarii mai mari? Ronline 07:16, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

E, păi nu ştiu cât va fi fără ajutor din Bucureşti acest lucru. Bucureştiul redistribuie o sumă semnificativă de bani de la regiunile mai bogate la Regiunea Nord-Est (nordul Moldovei). Am auzit că Iaşiul este excepţia fiind că este oraş destul de dezvoltat. Dar, mult mai multă lume pleacă în străinătate din Botoşani, Suceava, Piatra Neamţ decât din alte oraşe a ţării. Este bine să aud că se dezvoltă Moldova... şi celelalte părţi ale ţării se dezvoltă şi cu cât e mai rapidă dezvoltarea, cu cât e mai bine. Tu ai fost în Republica Moldova? Acolo cum e? Ronline 07:34, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

Winnermario

I will watch the page. mikka (t) 18:21, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

Vandalism is blanking a user's talk page and continuing to revert to the blanked version. Please try to be civil on other's talk pages.--malber 11:37, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

What a fool you are! Winnermario wants her taklpage that way. Her wish should be honoured. And you also harassed her by saying that if she wants to leave, she should leave altogether. I don't understand what punks like yourself do on a site like this. What's the point of just harassing people? This is an information site. This is the reason why I'm being an asshole; because of people like this guy. --Anittas 11:58, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

It's a valid question if she's going to say goodbye, why does she keep coming back? And if she's going to keep coming back, it's bad form to blank her talk page. Methinks the "lady" doth protest too much. I'd also like to remind you of the Wikipedia:No personal attacks policy. Might do you some good to read it. I'm going to leave your ridiculous comments on my talk page. --malber 20:34, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

It doesn't matter. You're not allowed to revert other people's userpages just because you don't want them to be blank. Now, shut your mouth! And take your stupid links with you! Haha! --Anittas 01:01, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

If she's truly gone, why would she care? And it's really bad form to vandalize other people's talk pages. From the looks of yours it would appear that you have a problem with personal attacks. --malber 01:17, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

It doesn't matter. You're not supposed to revert other people's talkpages. Is that so hard to comprehend? And yeah, I like to insult dumbasses and other freaks. :D --Anittas 01:21, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

Palatul Culturii din Iaşi

Am găsit o poză de pe Flickr cu Palatul Culturii. Am făcut upload la Commons, poza se găseşte la Image:Iasi cultural palace.jpg. M-am uitat şi la alte poze cu Iaşi, oraşul arată foarte fain, să ştii că am rămas mirat. Trebuie să vizitez neapărat! Ronline 10:07, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

Am insertat-o imediat după ce am trimis-o. Este la sfârşitul articolului Iaşi, în secţia Education, science. Ronline 11:02, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

Personal attack

Anittas, I suspect that it is you who is the author of this. If not, sorry, wrong address. But if that is you, please note that that is a personal attack which is not acceptable. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 15:40, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

Is it signed by me? I know who it is. Node also knows who it is. Ask him. --Anittas 16:11, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

Official Statement of President Basescu concerning the same romanian people from Moldova and Romania

Link: *http://www.averea.ro/display.php?data=2005-11-28&id=12172

"Moldovenii si romanii sunt, in esenta, un singur popor" declared romanian President T. Băsescu.

"Moldovans and romanian are in essence, the same people" (President of Romania T. Băsescu). I found this very interesting and deserve to be added in the text.  Bonaparte  talk & contribs

Remarks

Anittas, let us settle this business once and for all. I thought you are a smart person who gets it, but it seems you don't. So I will be blunt.

I am who I am. I bear my father's last name and I am happy with that. I got a first name which my parents thought was a good name, and I love my name. It is part of my identity.

While I studied in Bucharest for four years, with all my colleagues being Romanian, they treated me as one of theirs, in spite of the name. I have a friend from Suceava, your Moldova, and he is a great friend of mine, again in spite of my name.

Your repeated and repeated insistence that I change my name to a romanian-sounding one is idiotic. Please stop that. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 14:14, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

On useless comments

Anittas, this is about this comment of yours. This is not a productive comment, and I removed it. Please do not write anything in that manner again.

The situation at the moldovan lanuage page so far has been rather stable. Please do not deteriorate it. Please note that I have enough of evidence already of your disruptive behaviour. If you continue, I will refer the matter to WP:AN/I and ask for a block.

Please do not get damaged the chances of a good working atmosphere. This will harm everybody and will turn out into a big waste of time. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 15:56, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

Penicillium candidum

Bogdangiusca has been pulling our legs. I'm going to throw a tomato at him when I see him. Alexander 007 12:32, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

---

Anittas, pregateste-te. Esti gata? La arme! ([[3]]) -- Bonaparte talk & contribs 22:21, 3 December 2005 (UTC)