User talk:Ceiap

Your submission at Articles for creation: Etherscan (June 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David Gerard was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Academic sources looked good, until I actually searched out and checked them. They're mainly passing mentions. (Please link your academic sources where possible.) RS press coverage is also passing mentions. Too much sourcing turns out to be cryptocurrency sites, including sources found Generally Unreliable at RSN. Important information about the company turns out not to be sourced to RSes.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Etherscan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David Gerard (talk) 09:35, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, David! I agree that some of the references may be in passing. However, in some cases Etherscan is used as a primary research tool for the scholars, which I think speaks to its relevance (even if the platform, as a tool, itself isn't the direct subject of the article). I hope to improve the piece with your notes in mind and resubmit. Thank you for reviewing! Ceiap (talk) 18:44, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ceiap! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David Gerard (talk) 09:35, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Etherscan[edit]

Hello, Ceiap. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Etherscan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]