User talk:Cgiugale

CHECK OUT THE FINAL PRODUCT: [Bryan v Macpherson]

Preliminary Bibliography

1. Ryan, Jack. "9th Circuit Use of Force Case Law - TASER® Case Re-visited, Bryan v. McPherson." Legal & Liability Risk Management Services & Training: Law Enforcement, Jails, Insurance Pools & Risk Managers. June 2010. Web. 06 Nov. 2011. http://www.llrmi.com/articles/legal_update/taser_9th_2010.shtml.

2. Winston, Ali. "Ninth Circuit Says Police Tasers Must Be Used with Caution | The Informant." The Informant. 1 Dec. 2010. Web. 06 Nov. 2011. http://informant.kalwnews.org/2010/12/ninth-circuit-says-police-tasers-must-be-used-with-caution/.

3. Griffin, Drew, and David Fitzpatrick. "Man Dies after Cop Hits Him with Taser 9 times - CNN." CNN. 22 July 2008. Web. 06 Nov. 2011. http://articles.cnn.com/2008-07-22/justice/taser.death_1_pikes-family-winn-parish-baron-scooter-pikes?_s=PM:CRIME.

4. Brave, Michael. "Bryan v. McPherson- A New Standard for the Use of Electronic Control Devices?" LAAW International, Inc, 13 Jan. 2010. Web. 6 Nov. 2011. http://www.ecdlaw.info/Cases/CA_Bryan_v_McPherson_Synopsis.pdf.

5. Sam W. Wu,“When Can I Tase Him, Bro?”: Bryan v. McPherson and the Propriety of Police Use of Tasers, 40 Golden Gate U. L. Rev. (2010), http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/ggulrev/vol40/ iss3/5.

6.

Re: Introduction[edit]

Hi Carla, welcome to Wikipedia! I'm Evangeline. Feel free to drop me a message if you need help. Don't forget to sign your messages by typing 4 tildes (~~~~). Bejinhan talks 04:20, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Carla! Good work on the case page... Npmakarov89 (talk) 02:05, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Right back at you Nicholas. Cgiugale (talk) 22:16, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

WP:SB

Re: Question/Help for Article[edit]

Hi, sorry for the late reply. It appears that someone has added the . to the title. You can change the article titles by moving the page. Bejinhan talks 06:12, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: InSITE Fellowship (February 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:InSITE Fellowship and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Sam ^Sing! 02:24, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Cgiugale, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- Sam ^Sing! 02:24, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: InSITE Fellowship (March 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bluerasberry was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:InSITE Fellowship and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:03, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:InSITE Fellowship[edit]

Hello, Cgiugale. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "InSITE Fellowship".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:59, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:InSITE logo.jpeg[edit]

The file File:InSITE logo.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]