User talk:DeltaAndTheBannermen

Welcome![edit]

Hello, DeltaAndTheBannermen, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 07:12, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Dr Greg. I noticed that you recently removed content from Counties of the United Kingdom without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dr Greg talk 18:28, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Politialguru per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Politialguru. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Izno (talk) 23:59, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Appealing block[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DeltaAndTheBannermen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Wrongly blocked

Decline reason:

If we unblocked everyone who said just that, more or less, we might as well not block anyone. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:34, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Second unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DeltaAndTheBannermen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe my case should be reviewed because it appears I've been blocked on the basis of using multiple accounts when I have not. I briefly read the relevant case page and an administrator stated clearly it's merely "possible" I've been abusing accounts, but can't say conclusively. That is to say there's no conclusive evidence, or in other words, no evidence that would stand up in court. From my pov, it's clear this has been a mistake and since administrators also recognise this is a possibility; I'd be grateful if my case could be reviewed when possible. Many thanks.

Decline reason:

This isn't a court of law. Please address the concerns raised at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Politialguru. Yamla (talk) 10:28, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.