User talk:DivineIntervention

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hi, DivineIntervention, Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions, you seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics! If you need help on how to title new articles see the naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. For general questions goto Wikipedia:Help or the FAQ, if you can't find your answer there check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. If you have any more questions after that, feel free to ask me directly on my user talk page.

Additional tips[edit]

Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!

Be Bold!![edit]

You can find me at my user page or talk page for any questions. Happy editing, and we'll see ya 'round.

Joe I 02:23, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ur welcome :) anything else i can do, dont hesitate :) Joe I 00:13, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for your addings to Turkish People[edit]

Hi, Let me thank you for your addings to Turkish People. In past two weeks, we, four users, were fignting in a revert war. User Khoi... was always resisting on his own beliefs. They are beliefs, because, he hasn't shared his opinion yet. He thinks that it is only a best time competition. Crap, he is a revert-fetish.

Tombseye has no patient what we say. For instance, he is, well actually it is a %100 girl, she supports the idea that Anatolia is a cultural mosaic. However, the mosaic doesn't include Oghuz Turks. She thinks that Anatolian Turks are converst of Armenians, Greek and Kurds. After Ottoman Empire was demolished, some people who had lived in another states of Ottoman Empire came to Anatolia. BUt it doesn't change the truth that Anatolia has been the mother land of Oghuz Turks for thousand years.

My personal opinion is that the article Turks and Turkey people should be different articles. Because, there are another 24 Turkic tribes in the world,a and TUrkish People article confuses people about Turks.

THanks again,

-- hybrid lily 08:23, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Actually, hybrid lily you are lying about me and are you trying to engage in some sort of personal attack when I have not done like-wise? I never excluded the Oghuz Turks from anything and I'm not a girl, although I don't know what difference that would make, and lastly many historians believe the Turks are Anatolian converts so it's not just me. With a name like Hybrid Lily can I assume you're a girl though? I had no problem with Divine Intervention's changes actually and agree with most of them. Your personal opinion is not the point. I put in various genetic studies to support my contention that most Turks aren't of Oghuz origin. Unless you have something that shows us that there was a massive population replacement, you've got nothing but opinion. And I don't have much patience with people who refuse to listen to other opinions. I have yet to see you compromise on anything. Tombseye 22:17, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, I didn't neither lie about you, nor accuse you. Well, I can say the same thing for you, because you didn't listen to me too. I dont care how much patient you have, but I have the same feelings toward you. You always accused me, still doing the same. How can you be sure about my knowledge of Turkish history ? You are not the one who can measure my knowledge. Perhaps, I have a bad english, but at least I am trying to learn it.
The thing you dont understand is that Oghuz tribe has 12 different division. Most of them immigrated to Anatolia. Some of them also built nations, for exp: Karamanogulları. They were Oghuz Turks, but from a different part. These are all mentioned at the Ottoman Arvhieves. Fatih took ove the control of their nation and sent them to Balkans.
However, I agree with you at the point that the last revert of the article is much more better than the past one.

Please can you lot stop arguing on my talk page. Peace. DivineIntervention 22:53, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

propaganda[edit]

Listen, you are new here, so read what a WIKI is before you go deleting things. A wiki is for ADDING information, not DELETING it. The photo of the khachkars in Julfa is an excellent photo, and like MANY other photos on this site is appropriate on more than one page. If you hate Armenians so much that you can't stand to see their artwork, then stay off of the internet, do NOT remove it from this site. Other than that, welcome to Wikipedia :-) --RaffiKojian 23:35, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I know what Wikipedia is, I am just questioning the need to put the same photo of the Khachkars that is already in the article about Julfa the place where the destruction took place, in the article of Nakhichevan? I dont hate Armenians at all so please dont make baseless accusations against me. DivineIntervention 20:39, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Right, you hate the idea of independence for any group except for non-moslems. You go and take down a picture of an Armenian cross that has already been discussed on a talk page and then go and revert a slew of corrections and additions to an article - again without any discussion. Let me be the first to say there is nothing divine about your intervention.

Fair use image removal[edit]

Sorry to edit your userpage, but I had to remove the image Image:Arsenal FC.png as it is used in Wikipedia under a fair use rationale. Wikipedia's fair use policy forbids the use of fair use images in user pages, so I have no choice but to take it out. Qwghlm 23:28, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merhaba[edit]

Merhaba! Bu rakamları koymamda ki amaç, bizim aslında adada çoğunluk olduğumuzu ve eşit haklara sahip olmamız gerektiğini medya arcılığı ile dünya'ya anlatmak.Bunu zaten konuşma sayfasında yazmıştım.Yoksa amacım alsa bölücülük yapmak değil.Ben son derece vatansever bir insanım.Bu arada, buraya da gelmek istermisin? "Supporters of TRNC"

Slm, Türkler sayfasında kimin resmi olması gerektiği yönünde oy verirmisin?[[1]]

-Inanna-

Wikipedia in Tetum[edit]

Independance[edit]

How come you support independance for some countries, but not others, specifically Scotland and Wales? - Hayter 20:08, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Düzenlenmesini istediğimiz ve ortak hareket etmemiz gereken konuları burada tartışalım -->Talk:Türk Kullanıcılar.Böylece zaman kaybetmemiş ve tüm konulardan haberdar olmuş oluruz.Senden ricam bildiğin tüm kullanıcıları bunlardan haberdar etmen.Okuduktan sonra da lütfen sil ki gizli kalsın...Inanna 21:22, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moslems[edit]

Being one who uses the old spelling for adherents of the Islamic faith, I came across your user page and was wondering: why you call "Muslim" the "correct spelling"? and why you don't think that "Moslem" is "the proper word"? So Moslem is not spelled phonetically, neither is Muslim. Most Anglophones pronounce them both "muzzlimm" or something like and that is not correct. English simply doesn't have a phonetical system of orthography and to try to enforce one now is a few centuries too late. Please explain what makes a spelling correct and proper over another which has a long history of legitimate and scholarly use. As I plan to continue the venerable old spelling, this may be a fruitful discussion which will prevent people from working in opposite directions. Srnec 05:28, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Southern Azerbaijan userbox[edit]

In the last 1400 years, Azeris and other Iranian Turks have ruled Iran. Can you explain to me how exactly they are "struggling"? I recommend atleast putting the Kurdish independance, because atleast they have been struggling for their nation. Azeris dont need to. -- - K a s h Talk | email 10:00, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:South azerbaijan flag.gif[edit]

Notice

The file File:South azerbaijan flag.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Superseded by c:File:Flag of South Azerbaijan.svg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:17, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DivineIntervention&oldid=1145056896"