User talk:Draft fan22

Hello Draft fan22! You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (Draft fan22) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! Epeefleche (talk) 05:37, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Navboxes[edit]

The navboxes you're creating are incorrect, if you plan on doing them, make them look like Template:Miami Dolphins roster navbox. Listing the navbox by position doesn't make sense since all the navboxes are for is navigation, NOT for organization.--Giants27 (c|s) 14:49, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since the navboxes you are currently creating are wrong, I am attempting to fix them. If you would please refrain from creating other navboxes the wrong way, that would be great. Eagles 24/7 (C) 21:14, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Guys, we really shouldn't say they are incorrect. There's no "right" or "wrong" way. There's just the way we've been doing it, and then there's this way. I personally like the old way better.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 21:30, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I used incorrect mainly because the other one if the accepted or correct version so anything other than that is incorrect since it's unaccepted.--Giants27 (c|s) 21:37, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to chime in. It is basic civility not to call it "incorrect." I think an established user like yourself understands the tone that wording puts off. He is a new editor and I'm sure when you were new you made good faith mistakes. --Brian Halvorsen (talk) 01:25, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

World Series navboxes[edit]

Hi. When editing navboxes, please do not delete the noinclude & /noinclude scripts at the end of the template, as they are necessary to avoid placing articles in incorrect categories. When you delete the script, all of the articles where a navboxes (mainly players) is used are placed in catagories such as Category:World Series championship templates. Thank you. - Masonpatriot (talk) 14:43, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Chicago Blackhawks roster navbox[edit]

Template:Chicago Blackhawks roster navbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.

Notwithstanding what other projects do, we've repeatedly rejected such templates within the hockey project. Nothing personal. Reso lute 03:43, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Chicago White Sox 1st round[edit]

Hello Draft fan22, I was wishing to discuss Template:Chicago White Sox 1st round. The way it has worked in the past is that the template needs to be supported by an accompanied page (ie, List of Chicago White Sox first-round draft picks). The template is currently up for deletion here if you would like to participate in the discussion. I just wanted to give you the heads up. --Brian Halvorsen (talk) 01:18, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]