User talk:Fənɛ́tɪks.fərɛvər

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Fənɛ́tɪks.fərɛvər, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —SPESH531 Other 01:15, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rejedef‎, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. TDL (talk) 06:29, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fənɛ́tɪks.fərɛvər (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Falsely banned

Decline reason:

checkuser evidence suggests that this is not the case. (You are blocked, not banned) --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 22:06, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fənɛ́tɪks.fərɛvər (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This account is not a sock-poppet of rejedef, or any other account. Please unblock this account

Decline reason:

Here you admit that you also edited Wikipedia anonymously and claim that "other people" are editing from the same IP, however whether it's the case or not - we don't care whether you're sockpuppets or meatpuppets - we block in such cases regardless. Max Semenik (talk) 18:17, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fənɛ́tɪks.fərɛvər (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Exactly! I didn't hide anything, which doesn't qualify it for sock-poppetry! Please unblock my account.

Decline reason:

Per below. I strongly suggest, that if you request unblock again after this, you really consider saying something that might genuinely convince us to unblock. Otherwise you will just be wasting our time, and I would recommend to any admin reviewing another request like this that talk page access be revoked along with the decline. — Daniel Case (talk) 02:16, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Really? What about other accounts mentioned at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rejedef? You implicitly admitted that they might be coming from your IP but don't belong to you. Max Semenik (talk) 20:11, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note to any admin reviewing this unblock request that the user was using 89.128.236.143 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) to evade the block (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rejedef) and has also been requesting unlocks at User talk:89.128.236.143. TDL (talk) 20:26, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Beef war[edit]

Hello Fənɛ́tɪks.fərɛvər,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Beef war for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:47, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]