User talk:Grace and Fuller

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hirolovesswords was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Grace and Fuller/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hirolovesswords (talk) 00:39, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Grace and Fuller, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Grace and Fuller! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! I JethroBT (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:12, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Request on 14:51:10, 27 December 2014 for assistance on AfC submission by Grace and Fuller[edit]

Article topics are presumed to be notable if they have been covered directly and in detail by independent, third-party sources. Testimonials that appear on your company website and letters you have sent are not third-party sources. Articles that do not mention the subject directly also do not demonstrate notability. Further, writing an article about your organization creates a conflict of interest and such articles are often deleted if even slightly inappropriate.

Based on the sources currently provided, I do not believe Expian meets the Wikipedia's general notability guideline or the notability guideline for products. However, if you believe your product is notable enough to deserve an article, I believe the best course of action would be to follow the steps at WP:BFAQ#COMPANY and have a third-party create the article instead, which would avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 19:26, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Thank you for your time.

Donna

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hirolovesswords was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Grace and Fuller/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hirolovesswords (talk) 19:26, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Google[edit]

I have tagged your page as WP:NOINDEX, which should remove it from some search engines, including Google. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 21:53, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of sandbox[edit]

I can have your submission deleted, however the website I believe you are referring to, wikirecent.com, is not affiliated with Wikipedia. Therefore, it may continue to appear after the page is deleted. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 16:22, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]