User talk:Gracekikigreen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


March 2021[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Ashleyyoursmile. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Fish slice (kitchen utensil) have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Ashleyyoursmile! 06:07, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Saadrafiq4. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Galley (kitchen) have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. — Saadrafiq4 (talk) 06:07, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Induction cooking. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Dam222 🌋 (talk) 09:06, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gracekikigreen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will handle informative news without any promotional, advertising or seo elements in future

Decline reason:

There is already an open request below. Opening multiple requests will not speed this process up in any way. SQLQuery Me! 20:15, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Gracekikigreen, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Gracekikigreen! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GoingBatty (talk).

Visit the Teahouse
We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:06, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Jar. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Chlod (say hi!) 02:01, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did with this edit to Yoga mat. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Chlod (say hi!) 02:08, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Cheongsam have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Cheongsam was changed by Gracekikigreen (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.916361 on 2021-05-10T06:14:56+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:14, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Link spam[edit]

Please do not spam Wikipedia with links to blogs. You may receive a soft ban on your account and/or IP address, which may escalate to a more serious punishment if you continue. All the best, CentreLeftRight ✉ 08:23, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Focus Technology (June 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DanCherek were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DanCherek (talk) 03:25, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Focus Technology[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Focus Technology, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --- Possibly (talk) 04:35, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021[edit]

Please do not replace reference lists, section headings, and existing citations with links to a website (a blog) you are promoting. This is in violation of Wikipedia's spam policy and policies against advertising on Wikipedia. The disclosure on your user page is inconsequential. You have been notified of this policy four times prior on your talk page. This is sufficient warning; your account and/or IP address may be blocked if you continue your pattern of edits. CentreLeftRight ✉ 06:23, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021[edit]

As it has become apparent that your account will be used solely for unconstructive editing, you have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest it by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} to this page.

Kuru (talk) 02:56, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gracekikigreen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will handle informative news without any promotional, advertising or seo elements in future

Decline reason:

Closing duplicate request Daniel Case (talk) 07:27, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hope you can unblock my ip.

In the past, I have not understood wikipedia rules well, now I read rules and understand them that I promise I will never handle any news with promotional, advertising or seo elements. All of news are informative, readable and reported by news site. @Kuru: Please give me an opportunity to edit on wikipedia and unblock my account ip.

UTRS 54349[edit]

UTRS appeal #54349 is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:46, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 54598[edit]

UTRS appeal #54598 is open. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:48, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gracekikigreen:. Did you open the above UTRS thread? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:56, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I opened. But I was forbidden immediately. I can talk with you here. Thanks. Now would you please help me unblock my ip? Thanks.

UTRS 54715[edit]

UTRS appeal #54715 is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 05:37, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gracekikigreen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will handle informative news without any promotional, advertising or seo elements in future. Please unblock my ip. Thanks

Decline reason:

You will not be unblocked while you are abusing multiple accounts, as you have with Focustech. SQLQuery Me! 20:18, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

In the past, I have not understood wikipedia rules well, now I read rules and understand them that I promise I will never handle any news with promotional, advertising or seo elements. All of news are informative, readable and reported by news site. @Kuru: Please give me an opportunity to edit on wikipedia and unblock my account ip.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gracekikigreen&oldid=1072654254"