User talk:Guldenat

User:Guldenat/Talk/Archive 02/2007 - 04/2008

Welcome to my User Talk page. Feel free to leave me a message, and I will get back to you at the first opportunity.

Your revert[edit]

You recently made this revert. All of my changes are based on the sources already used in the article. In the intro, I just took information from the lower sections to give a better summary, and everything else was just expanded and corrected according to the sources that were already being cited. You also reverted a couple ^{[citation needed]} tags and a new, sourced edit. LokiiT (talk) 19:35, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, well like I said I took information from the lower section and used it in the intro. That first figure was just one persons estimate, so I moved it to the lower section and put in the intro a wider range of various estimates. LokiiT (talk) 19:42, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem, was just curious. LokiiT (talk) 19:44, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cleon Skousen[edit]

Hi. I responded at the talk page, but I just wanted to follow up here, too. :) Personally, as an admin who donates most of her time to copyright problems, I'd rather see somebody voice concerns over an article that turns out to be okay than stay quiet about what that doesn't. (Not that I'd see the latter, but you know what I mean. :)) Besides, as I said there, it happens to all of us. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 03:04, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk about tunnel vision, I didn't even notice the content of the article. :) When you said "fan", I thought, "Oh, sports figure" and went to take a look. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:53, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ichthus: January 2012[edit]

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here

I work for in Bishop Nicholas DiMarzio's office, his wikipedia page comes up as press releases, can we please have the flags removed?Lovesummer (talk) 21:04, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Feast day listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

I have asked for a discussion to address the redirect Feast day. You might want to participate in the redirect discussion.

You are receiving this message because you are a member of WikiProject Catholicism and/or WikiProject Saints --Jayarathina (talk) 12:37, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey[edit]

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]