User talk:Illyriandescendant

Stop Vandalism, see [1]--User1389 (talk) 19:26, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are violating WP:3RR on Šarplaninac[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

This warning is being given to both you and user:User1389. I have no opinion in the edit war you two are engaged in, but you both must stop reverting each other or you will be reported and possibly blocked. keɪɑtɪk flʌfi (talk) 17:20, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see and respond at Talk:Šarplaninac#Warning:_edit_warring William M. Connolley (talk) 21:55, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't. You continued edit warring [2]. You're blocked for 8h William M. Connolley (talk) 20:30, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

user:User1389 has a problem with Kosovo, why engage edit wars I told him befor, long time ago.Please do not engage edit wars...

but he keept reverting edits, I writed facts while user:User1389 and user:NikolaSomolenski writed lies, please take a look at the article...

You won't solve your grievances by reverting the article into the ground. I see you have once again reverted without any discussion. Don't do this. The talk page is there to discuss these issues William M. Connolley (talk) 10:30, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IM BAK, BAK AGAIN,

Please, do not say crap...[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia.

Tadija (talk) 22:32, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are reported, so, until you wait for the blocking, stop your edits.[edit]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you use Wikipedia for advertising, and for the promotion of your poor, incorrect ideas, you will be blocked from editing.

Tadija (talk) 19:16, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 22:17, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Seba5618 (talk) 22:19, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning for edit-warring[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Đeravica. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.
As you have received similar warnings before, any new edit on this article or others reverting the edits by Tadija (talk · contribs) or others reverting you, will result in a block for edit-warring. Regards So Why 18:55, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for edit-warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. So Why 21:17, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for edit-warring. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. So Why 21:01, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pančić's Peak[edit]

Pleas, stop reverting the article Pančić's Peak. It is obvious that Pančić's Peak is not in Kosovo, but in Central Serbia. Look at any map. If You do not agree, use discussion page. If You continue to do this without an explanation, I'll have to report You. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:10, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]