User talk:Inas

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome!

Hello, Inas, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Twenty Years 01:31, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Yes we Canberra! DVD[edit]

Must've been a mistake I made. It came out this month and I've already got it. I'll just fix it. --Victory93 (talk) 08:24, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Burke and Wills[edit]

(cur | prev) 09:30, 5 November 2010 Inas66 (talk | contribs) (37,736 bytes) (→Members of the Exploration Committee: Not all of the list would have identified as Victorian.) Certainly none of the members on the list were born in Victoria, but they all played a significant role in determining the direction Victoria took, and therefore they were all prominent Victorians. I am not sure which of the list would not have identified as Victorian - maybe you could identify which ones you think would have objected to being called prominent Victorians? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rocketfrog (talkcontribs) 12:33, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

The one I had in mind was Francis Cadell (explorer). He was not Victorian, he spent little time there. I doubt he would have considered himself Victorian, and history records him as a prominent Australian/Scot. No doubt many on the list were prominent victorians, however there may be others that were not. I think their significance is best acknowledged in the text adjacent to their names. --Inas66 (talk) 19:47, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer permission[edit]

Wikipedia Reviewer.svg

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:32, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

June 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Narrabeen, New South Wales may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:57, 6 June 2013 (UTC)