User talk:Jackehammond

This user is not an administrator.

---

The Wikipedia Essay Everyone Should Read - Please!

User:Antandrus/observations on Wikipedia behavior.

--Jackehammond (talk) 06:59, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

TILTING AT WINDMILLS

"When you see something that is seriously wrong .... you have an obligation to yourself and your employer [e.g. the nation or your organization] to speak up. It may cost you your job, but a life you ended up being proud of of is not going to one that was free of risk and pain ... "

(by Charles Peters in TILTING AT WINDMILLS, Washington Monthly March 1987)

.

Mike Overly see User talk:AlphaVictorSierraIndiaGolf

I think BWilkins just wants Mike to clearly "acknowledge" the WP:COI issues and perhaps implicit is also he wants a promiss that Mike will only edit the talkpage of any article he has COI with not its main page. All other non-COI editing would be fine. Perhaps all will be well if Mike does this soon! Best wishes, (Msrasnw (talk) 16:02, 19 February 2013 (UTC))

AFM???

• Jackie old boy, how are you? FYI, I have the piece right in-front of me now and was delighted that you've made some nice changes/updates to the page of Dassault Mirage F1, will help you out later. Just out of curiousity, have you come across any published news that the Republic of Singapore Air Force has taken delivery of their first batch of Alenia Aermacchi M-346 Master (at Cazaux Airbase in France)? Well, my sources told me yes but the press release is nowhere to be found! Cheers~! --Dave ^{♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®} 10:06, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Dear Dave, I am doing as well as can be expected of a 65 year old man who has some unexplained virus that has attacked the balance system. As to the M-346 I did read about it in Air International where they will be based in France to train Singapore pilots. And besides Singapore, Israel and Italy and UAE and the Saudi both are to sign contracts soon. I will try and find that back issue. --Jackehammond (talk) 21:15, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

• Jack, please don't look for them, I have all the back copies at my place. It's just that latest bit about the delivery of the M-346 to RSAF that has me up in arms for the news blackout, think I read it somewhere on "Combat Aircraft Monthly" (a sister publication of AFM) but lost track of it now. --Dave ^{♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®} 03:33, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

• And another thing, seems that General Dynamics is going to make a comeback, this time teaming up with Alenia Aermacchi for their bid (as the M-346's derivative - the T-100) in the T-X program. What's your take on that? --Dave ^{♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®} 08:04, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

BAe will win the contract with their advance HAWK, because it is the safe choice with no vices and because the US owes the British a big favor. The South Koreans are really pushing with their T-50 advance trainer. They are pouring million of dollars for high power US lobbyists and are promising about all 50 state governors jobs in building the T-50--Jackehammond (talk) 10:46, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

UH-60 Black Hawk

I'm quite well aware of that. Thanks. --THE FOUNDERS INTENT ^PRAISE 15:10, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Dear Editor,

I am sorry I bothered you, but I was answering a question you posted on the UH-60 page.

Jack E. HammondJackehammond (talk) 21:20, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Okay fair enough, not sure what question I asked, but I've known these facts for quite some time. Appreciate your consideration though. --THE FOUNDERS INTENT ^PRAISE 02:15, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to T-12 Cloudmaker may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• as '''Cloudmaker''' demolition [[bomb]] was developed by the [[United States]] from 1944 to 1948(ie. the US produced the Tallboy for the USAAF under the designation [[Tallboy (bomb)#Use by the

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:40, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Air International position

Thanks Jack! I dropped Mr. Willis a line to test the waters. Cheers, W. B. Wilson (talk) 18:16, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Bofors 57-mm m/54

Bofors 57 mm m/54 anti-aircraft gun - Jack, can you add anything about this weapon? Tough to find much information about it. Cheers, W. B. Wilson (talk) 20:16, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

I read some where that all it is, is a L70/40mm up scaled to 57mm. Nothing like the 57mm Bofors of today.

Jack E. Hammond--76.251.228.99 (talk) 07:26, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Wiki-Crusaders listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wiki-Crusaders. Since you had some involvement with the Wiki-Crusaders redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). John Vandenberg ^(chat) 00:59, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Venzuela Iron Mines listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Venzuela Iron Mines. Since you had some involvement with the Venzuela Iron Mines redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Vercelas (quaestiones?) 20:13, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ACCP-04.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ACCP-04.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 26 June 2022 (UTC)