User talk:Jamesington
June 2011[edit]
Please do not add inappropriate images to Wikipedia as you did to Cat; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ۞ Tbhotch™ & (ↄ), Problems with my English? 23:11, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
CATS ARE NOT INNAPROPRIATE IMAGES! I can shout as well, THEY ARE IF YOU ARE PROMOTING YOUR MASCOT!!! Please see image captioned " Cat looking at birds" or something similar. You will see that it is a cat staring at what probably is nothing. Not relevant.. Just because you don't like it does not mean it is vandalism... Wiki uploader even states you can upload pictures of pets.... So there.
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Cat. Your edits have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing. ۞ Tbhotch™ & (ↄ), Problems with my English? 23:22, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Cat. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
- Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ۞ Tbhotch™ & (ↄ), Problems with my English? 23:22, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Depth of field[edit]
Looking more carefully at your edits, I now agree that replacing the existing image of the cat with your image is inappropriate. Though I agree that your image makes a point that the existing one does not, the opinion of those who’ve worked on this article for quite some time is that the current image of the cat adequately illustrates shallow DOF. So please make the case on Talk:Depth of field before replacing the existing image again. JeffConrad (talk) 05:50, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Please stop edit warring on this; you’ve now been reverted several times by several different editors, and you’ll soon be blocked if you keep this up. Why can we not have both cat images? Wikipedia, and especially Depth of field, is not an image gallery. We made the decision some time ago (see Archive 1 of Talk:Depth of field for the discussion) to limit the number of images, and even removed some that we had. Per MOS:STABILITY, the current images take precedence unless there is consensus for replacing one or more of them. If you think you can make the case for your cat image, please do so on that Talk page rather than continuing with your disruptive edits. JeffConrad (talk) 20:50, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Cat[edit]
Regardless of any discussion, your three reverts are up. I'd advise you argue your point at the article's talk page. (For what it's worth, the "cat watching birds" image is there to illustrate the impact of cats on birds.) Mato (talk) 23:59, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Final warning[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:25, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
ANI[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:31, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Jamesington, you may be blocked from editing. ۞ Tbhotch™ & (ↄ), Problems with my English? 23:12, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
Talk pages[edit]
You really should read WP:UP#OWN. The user page and talk page do not belong to you. Therefore you are not able to define what happens on them. Refactoring other editor's posts is looked down upon and in serious cases have led to blocks. Also see WP:LAME with regards to your edit warring on Cat. --Blackmane (talk) 00:34, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Block[edit]
I've blocked you for 12 hours for disruptive editing. Please take this little time out to cool down and consider WP:CIVIL. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 07:20, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Thanks. Thats sure to make me feel good!
June 2011[edit]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Depth of field. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
- Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. MarnetteD | Talk 20:14, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
- You have made your edit it has now been reverted by multiple editors. Per WP:BRD you now need to go and make your case for the inclusion of your picture on the talk page for the article in question. Further edit warring may result in a longer block than the one that you already received. MarnetteD | Talk 20:14, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
July 2011[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Depth of field, you may be blocked from editing. The "vandalism" template isn't ideal here, but please stop pushing your own image; make your case on the talk page to avoid WP:COI. Dicklyon (talk) 22:50, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Dicklyon (talk) 22:50, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
A kitten for you![edit]
KITTENS!!
Jamesington (talk) 23:20, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
March 2017[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jack Monroe. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Rebbing 23:38, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
I misclicked at Elizabeth II. Please contribute at the RfC on the talk page. DrKay (talk) 12:50, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
If you take a look at Talk:Elizabeth II, you'll see there is a long discussion going on about surname. Please participate in the discussion there. Schazjmd (talk) 15:55, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
December 2023[edit]
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Sophie Anderson (actress), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 01:19, 6 December 2023 (UTC)