User talk:Kchampeon

Welcome!

Hello, Kchampeon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! - Jaxfl 01:17, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Harriet Pattison[edit]

The article Harriet Pattison has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 23:07, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Harriet Pattison[edit]

The article Harriet Pattison has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Potential unsourced BLP...has two sources of questionable reliability and relevance. Also, probably not notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Purpleback pack 89≈≈≈≈ 15:31, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article notability notification[edit]

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, Zuckerkandl (film), has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "Zuckerkandl (film)" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 02:05, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How margin of error works — Statewide opinion polling, Democratic Party primaries, 2016[edit]

User All4peace (talk) has initiated a discussion, on the article talk page on English Wikipedia about how we present MOE.

I would very‐much appreciate your participation ! Info por favor (talk) 23:24, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Key Howard for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Key Howard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Key Howard until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. agtx 20:16, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Peter Dunning[edit]

The article Peter Dunning has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This person seems to be notable for only one event, and is the article would seem to be a pseudo-biography. Ordinarily I would redirect to Peter and the Farm, but that itself is a redirect.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Derek Andrews (talk) 11:36, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]